A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

This time, however, the types of matter involved and the extreme nature of the Birkeland currents present have
resulted in a concentration of EM force that produces magnetic fields of stupendous power and range [6-30] [6-31] .
By addressing pulsars, neutron stars and magnetars in this way, I am conscious of possibly venturing close to
promoting them as unique physical objects, which would be wrong to do. In reality, none of them exist as the
objects that standard astro-science would have us believe. All of them instead result from powerful electrical
actions that take place within regions of concentrated, charge separated ionised matter.
Black Holes: The story around gravity ‘monsters’ does not stop with what has been said to this point for there
remains the supposed daddy of them all - Black Holes. Following on from what was said in chapter three,
the observed phenomena of Black Holes seems to be an extension of what has already been described as the
actual make-up and operation of pulsars, neutron stars and magnetars. It looks like all of these arise from the
effects of powerful current flow within and between concentrations of plasma. The mistake being made, in my
opinion, is that separate identities are being assigned to what are actually electrical actions that occur at every
scale throughout the universe. If one looks closely at the subject of Black Holes, then in addition to being asked
to stretch one’s imagination in terms of what they are capable of doing, we are also in danger of being led to
believe in the physical reality of ‘nothingness’ and ‘infinity’. While admitting, of course, there is yet much
to learn, this is still a stretch for anyone trying to keep their feet on the ground while attempting to come to a
common sense view of our universe. Should we just let the theoretical astro-scientists and mathematicians get
on with it and accept what they tell us is true? I say no, and I say we should pay no heed to the subject of Black
Holes because they do not exist; even Einstein did not support the idea of them!
As long as today’s astro-science community ignores the existence of electric currents at every scale in space,
their examination and assessment processes will remain inadequate and misleading, not just for that community
but for everyone. Their toolbox is incomplete and they are unaware of that fact, so all the problems they come
across are ‘fixed and explained’ using the limited gravity tools they have. And unfortunately, they seem doomed
to continue producing pointless conclusions from their predominantly public funded work. It is as if we were
watching the comedy trio Larry, Mo and Curly (The Three Stooges) as pretend astro-scientists baking a simple
cake - what should we expect them to produce if they do not include the flour they deny is needed whilst being
in possession of clear evidence that says that it is?
The single limited snapshot we currently have of the universe is nothing in the grand scale of things. Despite
being aware of this, we still seem happy and confident in making judgements and predictions about absolutely
everything while showing no appreciation for the fact that a wider range of variously influenced events could
have taken place during the time that has passed till now. We are undoubtedly a very capable lot, and I fully
understand the inherent need we humans have to drive forward in everything, but is it not arrogant of us to be
so certain of what we know at this point in time?
11 | The Electric Universe answers I see