A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

It seems once again that what was known about the behaviour of volcanoes and lava here on Earth was transferred
to what they thought they were seeing on the Moon. Unfortunately, this explanation has been stuck to ever since
with no room for broader discussion on the matter. It is the line of thought automatically transferred to apply to
similar features on other bodies, but it is especially the case with the subject of flat-bottomed craters [6-59] . Astroscientists
continue to cling to mechanical impact and/or geological disturbances as the only possible lines of
explanation for craters and other surface scars. To me this is an example of self-defeating tunnel vision.
I also must address the claim from astro-science that round craters and their internal features can be accurately
reproduced in the laboratory, no matter the angle at which a projectile is fired at a surface. Keep in mind that the
obvious idea of craters being formed through impact events and the understandable human desire to be correct,
would together likely form the backdrop to people’s thinking as they considered why they should support that
simplistic idea. I liken this to where a person with a narrowly developed belief will tend to ignore anything that
contradicts it while recognising only that which is supportive. People just like to be right!
It is apparently the case that experiments have been carried out using miniature high velocity projectiles to show
that round crater-like features can be produced no matter at what oblique angle the projectile is fired into sand
or some other analogue of compacted surface-type materials. The results show simple crater-like shapes but
none with the distinguishing external or internal features of real life craters. Arguments put forward based on
this inadequate evidence should therefore be rejected, and in my opinion, those who conduct these expensive
experiments should be put on the spot with questions about the accuracy of their results when compared against
actual observations.
As Mr Spock of Star Trek fame might say to explain how the vast majority of craters are formed… ‘Let logic
dictate that due to evidence from direct observation, surface cratering is undoubtedly produced by a force acting
vertically and in a rotating fashion to remove material quickly and cleanly from the body.’ This really is what
the evidence indicates, so to explain cratering and surface scarring in terms of EU theory we must concentrate
completely on electrical discharge events [6-60] [6-61] .
Experiments in electrical and plasma laboratories
can now be done to reproduce major features of the
cratering and scarring we find on planets, moons,
comets and asteroids. Further to this, by-products of
these experiments are frequently produced that are
useful electrical clues, such as here where we find
small round globes or ‘spherules’ known as Martian
Blueberries.
Hematite Spherules (Martian Blueberries)
Left on Mars & Right from Laboratory
Credit: NASA (Left) and C.J. Ransom (Right)
143 | The Electric Universe answers I see