A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New

... I previously mentioned the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) which our instruments indicated was
evidence of a very smooth 'energy/temperature background' to the universe. Well, despite the fact that this
discovery was conveniently taken to support the idea of ‘inflation’, the recent WMAP [3-7] (Wilkinson Microwave
Anisotropy Probe) space mission has through its higher resolution sensors detected a significantly uneven
spread of hot and cold regions across the CMB. This spread of uneven temperatures indicates that things out
there are not as smooth as the experts originally thought they were. In actuality, the very existence of this more
uneven temperature profile contradicts the idea of inflation and other predictions derived from Einstein’s theory
of relativity.
… If we consider again the idea of an expanding universe with its far-away galaxies supposedly travelling further
away and gaining speed all the time, then these galaxies should be dimmer than the galaxies that we know are
close to us. I think this sounds reasonable. It turns out, however, that far away galaxies are of similar relative
brightness to those that are close to us. An example of this is galaxy HUDF-JD2 [3-8] Again, the implication here
stands in direct opposition to the idea of an expanding universe.
… The galaxy M87 [3-9] (Virgo A) is seen to be ejecting material at faster than light speed. This again contradicts
Einstein’s theories.
… There is a cluster of galaxies 600 million light years away from us referred to as Abell 3376 [3-10] . In 2006, this
cluster was observed to be surrounded by a 6 million light year in diameter ring structure of glowing material,
the temperature of which was measured to be in the region of 60 million degrees Kelvin. This is many tens
of times hotter than the hottest area associated with our Sun. Again, there is not a snowball’s chance that the
‘mechanical shock’ theory of the gravity model could ever explain this extreme level of temperature generation.
It is also interesting to note that NASA pages on the web do not refer to or even hint at this issue. Once again,
the gravity model and its proponents fall short in their ability to address what we see in the real world.
… There is an Australian physicist by the name of Stephen Crothers [3-11] . I mention him because he has put
forward what seems to be proof for many scientists that Einstein’s equations that led to the subsequent invention
of Black Holes, are fundamentally wrong - the interpretation of the mathematics appears to be wrong, believe it
or not! In addition to this being a challenge for many to accept, it should be kept in mind that Einstein himself
became an objector to the Black Hole theory. You should also keep in mind that it was the use by others of
Einstein’s equations that established the theory of Black Holes. Despite all this, his name remains firmly linked
with the idea that they are real. It is odd that nothing is ever done to clarify any of this. I wonder, therefore,
if conveniently doing nothing supplies ongoing credibility to the idea of Black Holes. For anyone looking for
more detail on Black Holes, I would refer them to the work of retired Professor of Physics and Mathematics
Jeremy Dunning-Davies of Hull University and his book “Exploding a Myth” ISBN: 978-1-904275-30-5 [3-11a]
[3-11b] . In this book, Jeremy, as an expert commentator on the history of science, supplies a detailed but easily
digestible description of the truth behind the complete history of Black Holes.
4 | We are waiting for answers to these questions