A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Here are some <strong>of</strong> Alfvén’s other contributions. He explained the Van Allen radiation belt that surrounds the<br />
Earth. He provided an explanation as to why the intensity <strong>of</strong> the Earth’s magnetic field was affected when it<br />
experienced the effects <strong>of</strong> the Sun’s magnetic storms. He put forward a theory for the way in which our solar<br />
system was formed, and he explained the mechanism through which the tails <strong>of</strong> comets are formed. He also<br />
explained much about the behaviour <strong>of</strong> our Milky Way galaxy and that <strong>of</strong> the general cosmic environment. All<br />
<strong>of</strong> these explanations were based around the behaviour <strong>of</strong> current-carrying plasma in space.<br />
Another man whom we shall touch on shortly, Dr Anthony L. Peratt, wrote <strong>of</strong> Alfvén:<br />
[Alfvén made the] “... novel suggestion that the galaxy contained a large-scale magnetic field and that the<br />
cosmic rays moved in spiral orbits within the galaxy, owing to the forces exerted by the magnetic field. He<br />
argued that there could be a magnetic field pervading the entire galaxy if plasma was spread throughout the<br />
galaxy. This plasma could carry the electrical currents that would then create the galactic magnetic field.”<br />
The science establishment was not ready for Alfvén’s views or his style, therefore, many chances to advance our<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> how the universe works were lost. He really was a man ahead <strong>of</strong> his time.<br />
Immanuel Velikovsky (1895 – 1979) [5-4]<br />
This Russian author, historian and psychiatrist caused great controversy through<br />
his work which suggested an alternative interpretation <strong>of</strong> ancient history to that<br />
previously accepted by most as fact. He had a special focus in this respect on<br />
major physical events in the past that had seemingly affected the Earth globally<br />
and that were interpreted and recorded in similar ways in those times by ancient<br />
civilisations everywhere. These events were apparently frightful heavenly<br />
displays and geological disruptions that manifested themselves through powerful<br />
forces, including those <strong>of</strong> an electrical nature emanating from the skies. He<br />
suggested these events were responsible for global mass extinctions and he<br />
opposed the notion <strong>of</strong> Darwin’s model <strong>of</strong> evolution. He linked the histories<br />
<strong>of</strong> Jupiter, Saturn, Venus and Mars with that <strong>of</strong> the Earth in a way that could<br />
apparently account for the catastrophes recorded by the ancients, but his theories<br />
drew such a different picture that many just could not accept what he proposed.<br />
Although popular with the public, his challenging theoretical analysis seemed<br />
to make no impact at all on the astro-science or archaeological communities.<br />
Nonetheless, Velikovsky had and still has his supporters and his work has influenced aspects <strong>of</strong> the study and<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> electrical activity in the heavens. Many researchers <strong>of</strong> ancient historical events say that he uncovered<br />
some very interesting truths about the history <strong>of</strong> the Earth and the Solar System.<br />
7 | The work <strong>of</strong> the honourable but ignored<br />
Immanuel Velikovsky<br />
Credit: Frederic Juneman