A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
A Beginner's View of Our Electric Universe - New
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
I have a great deal <strong>of</strong> respect for Copernicus, <strong>New</strong>ton and Einstein as the honourable and dedicated characters<br />
they seem to have been. There are other contributors to science who deserve a mention, but that would be<br />
something for a different book, not this one. If you are particularly interested to know more about these and<br />
other pioneers <strong>of</strong> science, then you should look into the ancient and modern history <strong>of</strong> astronomy, physics,<br />
cosmology and mathematics. There you will find many in-depth historical and biographical accounts that do an<br />
amazingly detailed and interesting job <strong>of</strong> describing the work <strong>of</strong> these and other significant people. Suffice it to<br />
say that the foundations for what we have today as the story <strong>of</strong> our universe were laid from the work <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong>ton<br />
and Einstein.<br />
It was in 1905 that Einstein produced his first major theory that was eventually to become famously known<br />
as his ‘Special Theory <strong>of</strong> Relativity’. This title came about in 1919 after a particularly supportive observation<br />
was carried out by one <strong>of</strong> his colleagues, Sir Arthur Eddington, that apparently verified what Einstein’s theory<br />
claimed. In the theory, Einstein stated that among other things, the speed <strong>of</strong> light was constant at 300,000<br />
kilometres per second (in a vacuum) for all observers, whether they were moving or not. What he really had in<br />
mind here was the assumed empty vacuum <strong>of</strong> space. Derived from this was the inference that the speed <strong>of</strong> light<br />
is the fastest that anything can travel at in the universe - a universal speed limit, if you like. Although debated<br />
at the time, Einstein’s idea that light could travel through ‘nothing’ prevailed, so that which had become his<br />
Special Theory <strong>of</strong> Relativity stood strong among his peers and rapidly became accepted as scientific fact.<br />
Later in 1915, Einstein came up with his second major theory, the ‘General Theory <strong>of</strong> Relativity’. This was<br />
his crowning glory, in which he made a stab at laying out a geometric explanation <strong>of</strong> gravity. In doing this,<br />
he also came up with the assertion that our universe existed within a framework <strong>of</strong> what he labelled ‘spacetime’.<br />
The invention <strong>of</strong> this term was his way <strong>of</strong> describing our universe as an environment wherein time and<br />
space are related, or to put it another way, if you were able to change space, then you would change time, and<br />
vice-versa. These ideas seemed a bit crazy to some but made sense to others when the effects suggested were<br />
considered possible only when travelling at or close to the speed <strong>of</strong> light. Again, nobody seemed to have cause<br />
or motivation to object to Einstein’s latest theory, so it stood strong for a while before becoming acceptable<br />
scientific ‘fact’. None <strong>of</strong> this could be proved but it seemed that one plausible theory could stand with another,<br />
so the overall picture that developed took on a life <strong>of</strong> its own.<br />
Note here that Einstein’s theories really did spring from his own imagination. They had started as ideas from his<br />
personal ‘thought experiments’, as he called them; periods <strong>of</strong> deep thought that were also fuelled by aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
work done by others. No fundamental experiments could be done at the time to prove any <strong>of</strong> his theories and it<br />
remains a fact today that in terms <strong>of</strong> what they claim on the grandest scales, they have still not been proven. This<br />
means that anything currently promoted as solid fact regarding the assumed powerful influence <strong>of</strong> the force <strong>of</strong><br />
gravity on large scales can summarily be explained as only being the output <strong>of</strong> athletic, imaginative thinking.<br />
This fact alone should be enough to set some alarm bells ringing for us!<br />
26 | The thinking that got us here