“Quicklook” Assessment of Greater Adelaide's Assets & Challenges ...
“Quicklook” Assessment of Greater Adelaide's Assets & Challenges ...
“Quicklook” Assessment of Greater Adelaide's Assets & Challenges ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Eliminate customer confusion on public transportation and create payment<br />
uniformity<br />
Conclusion<br />
• Not business case to move forward at this time<br />
Issues<br />
• False Start - Tellstra pulled plug on Women and Childrens’ Hospital and Adelaide<br />
University<br />
• Less Government Interactions - ACT is small state with population <strong>of</strong> 350k. They<br />
are close to creating Smart Card. The city is Broadband enabled. One reason for<br />
success is only one level <strong>of</strong> government. Local and State are combined. State<br />
has toll road where smart card would be helpful.<br />
• Cost <strong>of</strong> the reader is a “stumbling block” particularly if there is not prior and/or<br />
other need for the card reader.<br />
• There is a perception that the market is not mature and evolution is still<br />
significant.<br />
• There must be a government lead such as transport for the system to become<br />
accepted by the populus.<br />
• There must be a uniform link at the national level such as Micros<strong>of</strong>t.<br />
• All electronic devices should be smart card enabled.<br />
• Smart Card readers must accommodate multiple platforms.<br />
• There is no private user big enough to develop the market.<br />
• Probably will have to develop two levels <strong>of</strong> smart cards at the governmental<br />
levels. The higher level will contain personal and possibly health information.<br />
The low-end level will be used for transportation purposes.<br />
• Don’t implement anything new until a national standard is identified and<br />
implemented.<br />
How are Other States Handling Smart Card Issues<br />
• Queensland<br />
o 16 different operators <strong>of</strong> public transportation<br />
o Customers want uniformity in transportation. Ex. Children get free<br />
passes in some areas and not in others.<br />
• New South Wales<br />
o Problem because <strong>of</strong> historical mistrust with suppliers.<br />
• Victoria<br />
o They like the system potential because <strong>of</strong> currency theft from existing<br />
systems.<br />
o Want to eliminate dealing with multiple operators.<br />
o Only state to discuss use <strong>of</strong> Cards with driver’s licensing<br />
• Tasmania<br />
o Ticketing system is worn out.<br />
o They are in the same boat as South Australia.<br />
• South Australia<br />
o Public tranportation is adequately functioning.<br />
o Library system does not see need<br />
o Initial costs<br />
o Not pr<strong>of</strong>it producing.<br />
• Concensus<br />
o States to continue meeting with each other<br />
COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE<br />
108