25.03.2013 Views

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER THIRTY-THREE<br />

LATE BABYLONIAN<br />

INTELLECTUAL LIFE<br />

<br />

Paul-Alain Beaulieu<br />

Late <strong>Babylonian</strong> intellectual life is known from thousands of cuneiform texts dating<br />

between the eighth and first centuries BC and unearthed in the libraries of palaces,<br />

temples and private houses. Most of the sources from the eighth and seventh centuries<br />

originate in Assyria, especially in the libraries collected by king Ashurbanipal in<br />

Nineveh. Although Assyria exerted its hegemony over the entire Near East during<br />

that period, Babylonia remained culturally dominant and <strong>Babylonian</strong> texts of every<br />

kind were avidly collected for the royal libraries (Parpola 1983b). Even scholarly texts<br />

in the Assyrian script were as a rule composed in the Standard <strong>Babylonian</strong> dialect of<br />

Akkadian and largely recorded knowledge compiled in Babylonia. <strong>The</strong>refore it is not<br />

surprising that after the fall of Assyria at the end of the seventh century the cuneiform<br />

tradition retreated to Babylonia, where it had begun nearly three millennia earlier,<br />

and continued its existence in temples and the private houses of scholars until the<br />

Hellenistic and Parthian periods. While Babylon and Uruk stand out as the two most<br />

important intellectual centers of the late <strong>Babylonian</strong> period, important finds were<br />

made at other sites, notably Sippar, Borsippa and Nippur. Our sources consist largely<br />

of texts belonging to the so-called “stream of tradition.” This is the generally accepted<br />

term to designate the corpus of authoritative editions of texts which stood at the core<br />

of ancient cuneiform scholarship. Another very important source is the correspondence<br />

between the Assyrian kings of the Sargonid dynasty (721–610 BC) and the scholars<br />

who advised them. Many of them were <strong>Babylonian</strong> and their correspondence helps<br />

us understand how they interpreted the knowledge recorded in scholarly texts.<br />

Cuneiform writing was the preserve of a small caste of professionals. In a letter to<br />

his employer the Assyrian king Esarhaddon, the <strong>Babylonian</strong> scholar Asˇarēdu the<br />

Younger alludes to the restricted diffusion of writing with a touch of wit when he<br />

warns him that “the scribal craft is not heard about in the market place” (SAA 8:<br />

339). Even kings were rarely literate beyond limited training in reading and writing.<br />

Among late Mesopotamian rulers, only the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal and the<br />

<strong>Babylonian</strong> king Nabonidus laid claim to advanced literacy and learning. Yet, in<br />

spite of limited dissemination, writing occupied a prominent symbolic place in the<br />

<strong>Babylonian</strong> world. Marduk, the demiurge and patron god of Babylon, regulated cosmic<br />

order through his possession of the Tablets of Destinies. His son Nabû, who even<br />

473

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!