25.03.2013 Views

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

The Babylonian World - Historia Antigua

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

— Late <strong>Babylonian</strong> intellectual life —<br />

of literature promoting the royal ideology, such as the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Legend<br />

of Sargon, the Cuthean Legend of Narām-Sîn, and the Weidner Chronicle. Students with<br />

higher intellectual ambitions started with the same basic education, but soon branched<br />

out to an enriched curriculum which was very heavily oriented towards the craft of<br />

the exorcist (āsˇipūtu). <strong>The</strong>y copied incantations, such as the series Utukkū Lemnūtu,<br />

magical and exorcistic series (Sˇ urpu and Maqlû), literary hymns and prayers, and the<br />

advanced corpus of lexical lists, including the encyclopedia Har-ra = h ˘ ubullu. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

also studied the fundamental theological texts that promoted the vision of Babylon<br />

as cosmic center and of its god Marduk as demiurge, namely the <strong>Babylonian</strong> Epic of<br />

Creation (Enūma elisˇ) and the topographical series Tin.tir = Babilu. Here the focus was<br />

not on the king, but on the gods.<br />

Specialized training did not take place in schools. After completing the basic<br />

curriculum, students who found employment in the administration presumably<br />

perfected their skills under the guidance of senior colleagues. As for students oriented<br />

towards the intellectual sphere, they could specialize in one of the three recognized<br />

disciplines of scholarship: the āsˇipūtu “craft of the exorcist,” the kalûtu “craft of the<br />

lamentation singer,” and the bārûtu “craft of the diviner.” At this point they continued<br />

training under the guidance of master scholars who often happened to be older<br />

members of their family. Indeed, if we rely on the colophons of library manuscripts<br />

and the information gleaned from private and temple archives, it appears that young<br />

aspiring scholars usually embraced the profession of their fathers. Writing in the first<br />

century BC, the Greek historian Diodorus of Sicily confirms the cuneiform evidence<br />

on this point. He gives us a vivid portrait of Chaldean scholarship, insisting particularly<br />

on its hereditary nature:<br />

For among the Chaldeans the scientific study of these subjects is passed down in<br />

the family, and son takes it over from father, being relieved of all other services<br />

in the state. Since, therefore, they have their parents for teachers, they not only<br />

are taught everything ungrudgingly but also at the same time they give heed to<br />

the precepts of their teachers with a more unwavering trust.<br />

(Library of History II.29.4; Oldfather 1968: 447)<br />

Families of scholars congregated into larger clans claiming descent from a common<br />

ancestor. Some clans maintained a virtual monopoly on a particular discipline. In<br />

Seleucid Uruk, for instance, all the lamentation singers (kalûs) descended from Sînlēqi-unninni<br />

(Beaulieu 2000). <strong>The</strong> exorcists (āsˇipus), on the other hand, were divided<br />

among several clans, such as the descendants of Ekur-zākir, H ˘ unzû, and Sˇangû-<br />

Ninurta, and we find astronomers (t.upsˇar Enūma Anu Enlil) among the descendants<br />

of both Sîn-lēqi-unninni and Ekur-zākir. Some families can be traced over several<br />

generations through the colophons of library texts copied by junior scribes, and the<br />

history of the Sîn-lēqi-unninnis can be followed, albeit with some gaps, from the<br />

sixth until the second century. A number of colophons contain additional notations<br />

on the purpose of the scribe in copying a particular text (Pearce 1993). Often texts<br />

were copied “for perusing” (ana tāmarti), “for learning” (ana ah ˘ āzi), or “for recitation,<br />

reading” (ana sˇitassi). This last term is based on the root sˇasû, whose primary meaning<br />

is “to shout, call.” It indicates that reading in Babylonia, as in many ancient cultures,<br />

was not internalized (silent), but performed by reciting the text sotto voce. <strong>The</strong> expressions<br />

475

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!