27.03.2013 Views

The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull

The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull

The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which had been founded on a forbidding promontory at the island <strong>of</strong><br />

Langeland in the 1560s to provide cod for the King’s navy and others<br />

willing to pay, went into decline soon after 1600 and the last inhabitant<br />

left it sometime around 1620. Albuen on Lolland (part <strong>of</strong> the Great Belt<br />

herring fishery) was abandoned around the same time. 331 In the<br />

Limfiord, we do not have comparable sixteenth century evidence to<br />

match the very good sources for the seventeenth century. When we do<br />

get information, it suggests that meagre years early in the century were<br />

followed by extremely good fishing seasons from 1610 to 1620. A slump<br />

then occurred between 1630 and 1650 before a period <strong>of</strong> some stability,<br />

at average yields, which lasted on for the rest <strong>of</strong> the century. <strong>The</strong>re seems<br />

to be no doubt that what had been a thriving fishing economy in the early<br />

seventeenth century was rapidly shrinking.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is probably no single explanation for the overall contraction <strong>of</strong><br />

Danish fisheries in the latter half <strong>of</strong> the sixteenth and early part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

seventeenth century. Rather we should look for a combination <strong>of</strong> factors,<br />

for both acute and chronic causes as well as ecological and economic<br />

forces.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sudden and almost complete cessation <strong>of</strong> the Norwegian fisheries<br />

by 1590 implies that there was a biological explanation. Possibly the<br />

herring shoals preferred spawning grounds outside the reach <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inshore fishermen. If, because <strong>of</strong> a slight change in currents or salt<br />

concentration, spawning suddenly took place in the middle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Skagerrak rather than in the sheltered archipelago <strong>of</strong> Båhuslen, the<br />

Danish and Norwegian fishermen may have found it impossible to catch<br />

the herring. Contrary to the shore-bound Danish fishermen, the Dutch<br />

herring drifters had developed a special technology which enabled them<br />

to conduct the required open-sea operations. <strong>The</strong> problem for the Danes<br />

and the Norwegians was that they lacked both the capital and the skills to<br />

acquire these vessels which would have enabled them to pursue the fish<br />

at sea.<br />

In the Limfiord, ecological factors played a decisive role. <strong>The</strong> barrier<br />

between the fiord and the <strong>North</strong> Sea in the west was breached by a flood<br />

in 1624, and the stock <strong>of</strong> herring which was accustomed to the bracken<br />

water died when the salt water came in. Only a decade later, the dune<br />

barrier was built up by the natural sand drift along the <strong>North</strong> Sea coast,<br />

and the herring stock regained strength.<br />

331 Berg et al., Sandhagen.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!