The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull
The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull
The North Atlantic Fisheries, 1100-1976 - University of Hull
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1) In recognition <strong>of</strong> the concessions given to the Faroese fishermen at Greenland the<br />
Lagting has to withhold its decisions <strong>of</strong> 1924 and 1925 and must express the wish and<br />
hope that the government after renewed considerations in full will comply with the<br />
wishes <strong>of</strong> the Lagting and by this with those <strong>of</strong> the Faroese population.<br />
2) <strong>The</strong> Lagting applies to the ministry on being informed about the statements that<br />
last year were pronounced by the Greenlandic councils in response to the wishes<br />
expressed by the Faroe Islands in this case. 159<br />
In Copenhagen the Social Democratic government and the central<br />
administration took the Faroese claims much more seriously this time.<br />
With broad acceptance both in the public and the political world,<br />
Parliament issued a new law, to run for one year but with a clear<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> extension if successful.<br />
<strong>The</strong> well situated and secure natural harbour <strong>of</strong> ‘Færingehavn’<br />
(Kangerluarsoruseq) near the mouth <strong>of</strong> Buksefjorden and the rich Fylla’s<br />
Bank was equipped and opened and immediately became a success. <strong>The</strong><br />
territorial sea <strong>of</strong>f the skerries was opened for inshore fishing with<br />
handline and longline but not for trawlers. <strong>The</strong> season was stipulated as<br />
three months.<br />
<strong>The</strong> debate in the Rigsdagen demonstrated that what mattered was not<br />
the many Faroese arguments but public awareness <strong>of</strong> the real social and<br />
economic problems <strong>of</strong> the ordinary families <strong>of</strong> the Islands. <strong>The</strong> real<br />
obstacle for the Faroese case lay in Grønlands Styrelse (<strong>The</strong> Greenlandic<br />
Department) which always had had much more power than the few and<br />
divided pro-Faroese civil servants in the central administration. <strong>The</strong><br />
other serious problem lay in the rising self-consciousness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Greenlanders expressed by their country councils who more and more<br />
vigorously opposed any interference in what they viewed as their special<br />
rights to the natural resources. In 1928 both the Greenlandic councils<br />
voted against prolonging the 1927 concessions to the Faroese. 160<br />
159 Committee report and caucus considerations on the address to the government, finally<br />
accepted unanimously 29 September 1926, Lagtingstidende, 1926, annex 73, 143-45.<br />
160 In Lagtingstidende 1927, annex 62, 131-32 and committee report, annex 15,<br />
185/1927 ‘Fisketørring i Grønland’, 1-2, are expressed recognitions <strong>of</strong> the achieved<br />
results but at the same time is demonstrated the immediate pressure for further<br />
concessions about installations for drying the fish and the use <strong>of</strong> a Greenlandic workforce<br />
to that end. <strong>The</strong> Home Secretary presented to Parliament in the spring <strong>of</strong> 1927 a law<br />
about the matter and urged for swift deliberation and prompt acceptance. Parliament<br />
responded accordingly and access to the territorial sea, better harbours, new charts etc.<br />
was confirmed by law. Only Danish (Faroese) and Icelandic fishing was allowed and no<br />
78