Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...
Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...
Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
120 <strong>Twenty</strong>-<strong>First</strong> <strong>Century</strong> <strong>Populism</strong><br />
in elections to the Parliament <strong>of</strong> Saxony. <strong>The</strong> party was unable, however, to<br />
repeat this success in subsequent state elections and, in the early national<br />
election <strong>of</strong> 2005, the total share <strong>of</strong> the vote for all representatives <strong>of</strong> the far<br />
Right remained as marginal (2.2 per cent) as it had been in 2002 and 1998<br />
(1.0 and 3.3 per cent respectively).<br />
More surprising than the absence <strong>of</strong> far-right electoral successes, however,<br />
is the lack in German politics <strong>of</strong> a more moderate right-wing populist force<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sort that we find in Italy, Austria, Switzerland and the Scandinavian<br />
countries. When the Schill Party, which took its name from Ronald Schill, a<br />
former local-court judge, registered the best-ever result achieved by a new<br />
right-wing populist party, obtaining 19.4 per cent <strong>of</strong> the vote in the election<br />
to the Bürgerschaft (state parliament) in Hamburg, journalists and academics<br />
feverishly speculated that the relative failure <strong>of</strong> Germany’s right-wing parties<br />
might be coming to an end. <strong>The</strong> attempt to establish the Schill Party<br />
nationally, however, was almost as miserable a failure as the efforts to launch<br />
a federal version <strong>of</strong> the Statt-Partei (Instead Party), which had also emerged<br />
in Hamburg a few years previously. Meanwhile, other new parties such as<br />
the Free Citizens’ League (Bund Freier Bürger) and the Pro D-Mark-Partei,<br />
formed in defence <strong>of</strong> the deutschmark, never left the starting blocks.<br />
How can the relative weakness <strong>of</strong> right-wing populism in Germany be<br />
explained? If the rise and electoral success <strong>of</strong> far-right and right-wing populist<br />
parties is regarded as the product <strong>of</strong> a modernization crisis within society,<br />
as most writers tend to argue, then it must be assumed that there is also<br />
a breeding ground for right-wing movements and parties in Germany. If we<br />
look at the eastern part <strong>of</strong> German society, where many sections <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
were hit by social insecurity after the overthrow <strong>of</strong> the Communist<br />
regime and now regard themselves as being on the losing side <strong>of</strong> political<br />
and economic changes, the potential for a right-wing party <strong>of</strong> protest in this<br />
area <strong>of</strong> Germany would actually seem to be above average. This is not only<br />
suggested by developments in other former Communist countries, such as<br />
Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, where right-wing extremist and populist<br />
parties feature just as prominently as they do in western Europe, but is also<br />
demonstrated by the high incidence <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> violence inspired by rightwing<br />
extremism and/or xenophobia. Whether there is any link between the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> violence, which is higher than in most other countries, and the relative<br />
weakness <strong>of</strong> right-wing extremist and populist political parties in<br />
Germany is a question, however, that has not yet been explored in any great<br />
depth by researchers. Explanations for the lack <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong> parties <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Right must therefore be based on the same categories that are applied in<br />
other countries to describe the transformation <strong>of</strong> the party system. <strong>The</strong>se<br />
will therefore provide the skeleton <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
As is customary when analysing the party system, a fundamental distinction<br />
must be made from the outset between structural factors and the agency<br />
<strong>of</strong> political players. As far as the former are concerned, the institutional