29.03.2013 Views

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 <strong>Twenty</strong>-<strong>First</strong> <strong>Century</strong> <strong>Populism</strong><br />

view that there are too many immigrants and who also expressed a low<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> ‘political satisfaction’, 27 per cent voted for Le Pen.<br />

<strong>Populism</strong> and the power <strong>of</strong> the ‘anti-political<br />

establishment’ strategy<br />

<strong>The</strong> Front National holds a clearly populist view <strong>of</strong> society as ‘ultimately<br />

separated into two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, the “pure”<br />

people versus “the corrupt elite” ’ (Mudde, 2004: 543) and its populist anti-<br />

Establishment strategy has been crucial to the success <strong>of</strong> the party. <strong>Populism</strong><br />

is characterized by<br />

(a) hostility towards the idea <strong>of</strong> representative democracy (within a democratic<br />

context, this may manifest itself in calls for direct democracy);<br />

(b) an image <strong>of</strong> ‘the people’ as a harmonious and homogeneous community,<br />

pitted against ‘the political class’ or ‘the Establishment’;<br />

(c) the idea that the populist party or leader represents ‘the voice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

people’.<br />

In Weberian terms, populist movements are charismatic, and try to base<br />

their appeal and legitimacy primarily on emotions rather than on rational<br />

considerations (cf. Weber, 1978: chapter 3).<br />

Populist ideology and rhetoric accord an essential role to the idea <strong>of</strong> ‘the<br />

people’. However, the term is ambiguous. <strong>The</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> inclusion are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

very fuzzy and populists are typically clearer about which groups are to be<br />

excluded. As Paul Taggart (2000: 96) has suggested, the lines <strong>of</strong> exclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten correspond to ethnonationalist or ethnoregional identities. This<br />

implies that populists <strong>of</strong>ten are ethnonationalist (which does not necessary<br />

mean that all or even most ethnonationalists are populists).<br />

However, although the party’s conception <strong>of</strong> democracy is a form <strong>of</strong> populist<br />

Herrenvolk democracy, or ethnocracy, the Front National differs from<br />

earlier French Right-wing extremist parties and movements in its selfproclaimed<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> democracy (cf. Marcus, 1995: 102). Rather, the FN<br />

is critical <strong>of</strong> existing, representative democracy, which it argues, is ‘a democracy<br />

<strong>of</strong> appearance’. According to the party, there is a deep gulf between the<br />

people and the political elite, and it is ultimately because <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong><br />

this gulf that it rejects the idea <strong>of</strong> representative democracy (Souchard et al.,<br />

1997: 135−136). In common with most other RRP parties, therefore, the<br />

Front National supports direct democracy (cf. Mény and Surel, 2000: 61).<br />

In order to mobilize protest votes, the Front National has used the ‘antipolitical-establishment<br />

strategy’. A party using this strategy tries to construct<br />

an image <strong>of</strong> itself in opposition to the ‘political class’, while simultan eously<br />

trying not to appear anti-democratic. A party that is viewed as antidemocratic<br />

runs the risk <strong>of</strong> being stigmatized and marginalized as long as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!