29.03.2013 Views

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Conclusion: <strong>Populism</strong> and<br />

<strong>Twenty</strong>-<strong>First</strong> <strong>Century</strong> <strong>Western</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> Democracy<br />

Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell<br />

Whose democracy is it anyway?<br />

Gerry Stoker concludes his recent book Why Politics Matters by affirming:<br />

‘Achieving mass democracy was the great triumph <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century.<br />

Learning to live with it will be the great achievement <strong>of</strong> the twenty-first’<br />

(Stoker, 2006: 206). Like Stoker, a whole series <strong>of</strong> scholars at the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new millennium have argued that the pillars <strong>of</strong> representative liberal<br />

democracy − in particular, parties and popular participation − are creaking<br />

(Pharr and Putnam, 2000; Diamond and Gunther, 2001; Dalton and<br />

Wattenberg, 2002; Crouch, 2004). In fact, apart from the euphoric period<br />

surrounding the fall <strong>of</strong> the Berlin Wall and the seemingly inexorable move<br />

towards a united, peaceful, harmonious and liberal democratic Europe,<br />

there has long been a tendency to focus on the negative aspects <strong>of</strong> how<br />

<strong>Western</strong> <strong>European</strong> democracies function. Indeed, as we can see from even a<br />

brief glance at <strong>The</strong> Crisis <strong>of</strong> Democracy (Crozier, Huntington and Watanuki,<br />

1975), in the past the portents have been worse and the prophecies far<br />

gloomier. For example, in the opening paragraphs <strong>of</strong> that landmark volume,<br />

under the heading ‘<strong>The</strong> Current Pessimism about Democracy’, we find the<br />

comment by the former West German Chancellor Willy Brandt before leaving<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice that ‘<strong>Western</strong> Europe has only 20 or 30 more years <strong>of</strong> democracy<br />

left in it’ (ibid.: 2).<br />

With the end <strong>of</strong> the Cold War, the broad acceptance by all parties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

basic merits <strong>of</strong> democracy and the decline <strong>of</strong> political terrorism in <strong>Western</strong><br />

Europe, such apocalyptic scenarios are no longer being put forward.<br />

Nonetheless, as Robert Putnam, Susan Pharr and Russell Dalton (2000: 6)<br />

write in their introduction to Disaffected Democracies, while support for<br />

democracy per se appears to be greater then ever, faith in its agents (i.e.<br />

politicians and parties) and its institutions has declined. As they point out,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> the public ‘expressing a partisan attachment has declined<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!