02.04.2013 Views

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY<br />

Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE <strong>PAGE</strong>:56/6<br />

<strong>of</strong> countries do not have required standards for sediment pollution estimate. In<br />

such cases, the government authorities use <strong>of</strong>ten the recommended values<br />

based on reference concentrations. However, some ICES members (Norway,<br />

Sweden and the Netherlands) regulated the sediment classification, which<br />

may be based on concentration <strong>of</strong> single contaminant (Table 3).<br />

Country Legislation Notes<br />

Belgium x Data compared against OSPAR BC<br />

Denmark x Locally derived BCs from reference sediment (mainly for metals)<br />

Finland x<br />

France x Data compared against OSPAR BRC and locally derived BCs<br />

Irland x<br />

Canada ? ISQG and PEL approach from field data demonstrating<br />

associations between chemistry and biological effects.<br />

Netherlands yes Two-class system (NEC and MPC) based on equilibrium<br />

partitioning or ecotoxicological data.<br />

Norway yes Five class system. Data compared against local, surface<br />

sediment concentrations.<br />

Germany x<br />

Portugal x Data compared against OSPAR BC.<br />

Spain x Data compared with international (e.g. USEPA) and locally<br />

derived BCs<br />

Sweden yes Five-class system.. BCs derived from cored sediments<br />

UK<br />

(England<br />

and Wales)<br />

x Data compared against OSPAR BRC: locally derived BCs in<br />

preparation<br />

Table 3: Summary <strong>of</strong> Environmental Quality Standards for sediments in International<br />

Council for the Exploration <strong>of</strong> the Sea (ICES) Members Countries<br />

x= standards not currently covered by legislation BRC=<br />

Background/reference concentration<br />

ISQA = Interim sediment quality guidelines PEL= Probable<br />

effects level<br />

USEPA= United States Environmental Protection Agency BC = background<br />

concentration<br />

NEC= No effect concentration MPC = Maximum<br />

Permissible Concentration<br />

Norwegian and Swedish standards predict five-class sediment classification.<br />

Sediment classification standards in Norway are given in the Table 4.<br />

Contaminant Unit Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5<br />

(good) (moderate) (poor) (bad)<br />

(very bad)<br />

Cooper mg/kg < 35 35 - 150 150 - 700 700 - 1500 > 1500<br />

Zinc mg/kg < 150 150 - 650 650 - 3000 3000- 10000 > 10000<br />

Cadmium mg/kg 10<br />

Chromium mg/kg < 70 70 - 300 300 - 1500 1500 - 5000 > 5000<br />

Nickel mg/kg 1500<br />

Lead mg/kg 1500<br />

Mercury mg/kg 5<br />

Total PAH µg/kg 20000<br />

PCB µg/kg < 5 5-25 25-100 100-300 >300<br />

Table 4: Sediment classification with respect to pollution grade in Norway, in < 2mm fraction,<br />

dry weight<br />

By comparing the defined maximum values <strong>of</strong> single contaminant in sediment<br />

to be dredged at the Port <strong>of</strong> Ploce with limit values in Norwegian standards<br />

the implication is as follows:<br />

- cooper, chromium, PAH and PCB meet limit values for the 1 st class<br />

RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!