HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE PAGE: 4 AESTHETIC OUTLOOK AND VISUAL IMPACT ON THE PORT OUTLOOK In all plans the port of Ploce is the second major state port. The construction of the Container terminal in the port is only one stage of port development and modernization which will not affect the present outlook of this area since the aesthetic atmosphere of the natural and untouched area in the Neretva delta on the sea shores has been permanently lost long time ago. The construction of the new Container terminal with extension of the port handling area for container storage will actually improve the existing, in the aesthetic terms quite ugly, picture of the port basin the port of Ploce, and with careful new construction, with the emphasis on the choice of colours, the visual outlook of this part of the port of Ploce should also be substantially improved. D.2.2.4 POSSIBLE CHANGES IN QUALITY OF AIR, SEA, CHANGES CAUSED BY NOISE IMPACT, IN NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL INCIDENTS D.2.2.4.1. AIR D.2.2.4.2. SEA D.2.2.4.3. WASTE D.2.2.4.4 NOISE Transshipment of containers shall take place at the Container terminal. In handling this type of cargo there is no additional air pollution, such as with dry bulk and bulk cargo. Because of the distance, the impact on housing settlements of the town of Ploce is negligible. Starting from the fact that planned project is foreseen in a rather degraded industrial and port area, that foreseen port activities do not include cargoes with are most problematic or big danger of sea pollution connected with them, by taking specific measures of protection, this project is acceptable from the aspect of sea protection against pollution. According to their origin and properties, the waste materials which occur in the port can be very different, but can generally be classified in two categories: a) hazardous waste and b) other waste substances. Handling of waste substances which occur in the port today is carried out on the basis and in compliance with legal provisions and port rules. The effect of waste and waste handling remain the same. Noise occurring during the use of the Container terminal shall not have any substantial impact on the environment since the terminal location is situated in the middle of the port area on the outside towards the sea. Distances from the town are well over 1500 m. RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE PAGE: 5 D.2.2.4.5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ON LAND The new traffic organization is not expected to increase the environmental impact, but rather the reduction of such impact. We make this conclusion on the basis of the fact that cargo will be handled and transported much more rationally which is also the basic objective of this newly built structure. ON SEA Newly built Quay 7 of the Container terminal shall affect the safety of putting in and out of the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7 of the port of Ploce. Additional procedures for safety of navigation upon entering this basin of the port of Ploce shall have to be prescribed. D.2.2.5. POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL INCIDENTS WITH ASSESSMENT OF RISK OCCURRENCE Occasional incidents can be expected, but very rarely and with brief time exposure to adverse effect of moderate strength, and generally an extent of such a risk can be graded as an “acceptable extent of risk”. RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.
Page 1 and 2:
OBALA 4 OBALA 3 60 000 DWT 50 000 D
Page 5 and 6:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Page 23 and 24:
A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41:
SL. 4
Page 47 and 48:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
HEIGHT OF SEA LEVEL (m) HEIGHT OF S
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
m o r e m o r e QUAY (OBALA) 5 m o
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
60 000 DWT 50 000 DWT l=290,0m b=32
Page 149 and 150:
60 000 DWT 50 000 DWT l=290,0m b=32
Page 151 and 152:
60 000 DWT 50 000 DWT l=290,0m b=32
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 205 and 206: A B C D SLUICE (ZAPORNICA) SLUICE (
Page 213 and 214: IRANA PLANIRANI 50 000 DWT l=290,0m
Page 225: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 235 and 236: PLANIRANI PLANIRANA PLANIRANI OBALA
Page 239 and 240: KV 2 PLS-02 KV 1 PL-02 SOK 1 PLS-01
show all

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?