HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE PAGE: 5 B.2.3. POTENTIAL CHANGES WITH REGARDS TO UTILIZATION B.2.3.1. CHANGES WITH REGARDS TO UTILIZATION The construction of the container terminal and the development of the operation and stacking zones will neither have negative impact on other facilities of the area nor affect their operating, as the major part of the proposed operation would be realized within the existing dock area and also the extension of the operation zone will be brought about by the development of the existing dock area. All the proposed operations are compliant to the existing physical plans. B.2.3.2 AESTHETIC QUALITY AND VISUAL CHARACTER All Plans consider the Port of Ploce as the second most important national port. The construction of the container terminal in the port is just one stage of the development and modernization plan, which will not impact the present aesthetic value of this area, since the past activities have already degraded the beauty of the natural and pristine environment in the Neretva Estuary. In fact, the construction of the container terminal and the extension of the operation/stacking areas will improve the present, rather ugly sight of the Ploce Port basin. More severe laws and requirements will introduce order in the utilization of the operation and the open storage area. New dock facilities, and careful development of the dock area would turn the port into a modern and best-equipped site. Careful new construction activities that would put a special emphasis on the color selection would considerably improve the visual character of this part of the Ploce Port. RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-033 CONTAINER TERMINAL PLOCE PAGE: 6 B.2.4. POTENTIAL CHANGES OF AIR OR SEA WATER QUALITY, CHANGES CAUSED BY NOISE, IN NORMAL CONDITIONS AND IN CASE OF ECOLOGICAL EMERGENCY B.2.4.1. AIR B.2.4.2 SEA On the container terminal container reloading activities will be carried out. These activities are not accompanied by additional air pollution, as it is the case with bulk or loose freight. Potential sources of the air pollution are: • Berthed ships • Heavy road cargo vehicles (trucks) Ship’s main engines usually do not operate when ship is moored, and emissions generated by auxiliary engines are insignificant. The trucks reloading cargo in the reloading area may be a source of additional air pollution, depending on the gasoline used and on how old the engines are and how well they are maintained. Nevertheless, due to the distance, the impact upon the settlements of Ploce is insignificant. In order to reduce the negative impact of the transport means on air quality, the cargo vehicles on the terminal have to meet the requirements of the new EURO II and EURO III standards. In general, the changes of the port morphology generate changes in seawater quality. The planned construction may primarily affect the sea currents, the water body dynamic and time for the water exchange in the entire port. A potential key problem may be a decreased water flow and the water exchange with the surrounding aquatorium. Weak flows and retarded exchange of the water loaded with organic matter and nutrient salts may increase the concentration of these substances and the growth of the algae and consequently cause a decrease in the oxygen concentration and further turbidity. This may result in complete lack of oxygen and development of anaerobic organic matter decomposition, which produces unpleasant odor and is toxic for many sea organisms. One may say that such is the present situation in the basin between Quay 5 and Quay 7. Proposed is also an extension of the basin between Quay 5 and the future Quay 7, which would in fact be a correction and extension of the existing basin that is currently too narrow for the estimated number of container ships. The operation will have a positive impact on the water exchange both in the port aquatorium and its surrounding. RIJEKAPROJEKT d.o.o.
Page 1 and 2:
OBALA 4 OBALA 3 60 000 DWT 50 000 D
Page 5 and 6:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Page 23 and 24:
A1. PURPOSE OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41:
SL. 4
Page 47 and 48:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
HEIGHT OF SEA LEVEL (m) HEIGHT OF S
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 129 and 130: m o r e m o r e QUAY (OBALA) 5 m o
Page 147 and 148: 60 000 DWT 50 000 DWT l=290,0m b=32
Page 163: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Rn: 03-0
Page 205 and 206: A B C D SLUICE (ZAPORNICA) SLUICE (
Page 213 and 214: IRANA PLANIRANI 50 000 DWT l=290,0m
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
PLANIRANI PLANIRANA PLANIRANI OBALA
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
KV 2 PLS-02 KV 1 PL-02 SOK 1 PLS-01
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
show all

HEADING PAGE - port of ploce authority * welcome

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?