03.04.2013 Views

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

successive cases of unigeniture as merely a series of flukes. Besides, Mehmed<br />

Çelebi seems to have done his historical homework in arguing that the Ottomans<br />

did not seem to have ever taken warmly to the idea of sharing; Orhan's brotherly<br />

suggestion to Ala'eddin is reported to have been not that they share the realm<br />

but that the latter be the "shepherd." In each generation, this reluctance to<br />

divide the realm manifested itself: with Murad I (r. 1362-89) and Bayezid I (r.<br />

1389-1402) both decisively eliminating the challenges raised by their brothers<br />

and/or sons; with none of the princes during the Interregnum (1402-13) pursuing<br />

any other goal than seizing control over an undivided realm; with Murad II (r.<br />

1421-51) again having to deal with contenders from the family in an all-out<br />

struggle; and with Mehmed II (r. 1451-81) finally legislating fratricide as the<br />

culmination of a centralist logic whose goal was to eliminate all tendencies<br />

toward fragmentation. The struggle between Mehmed II's sons led to Prince Cem's<br />

unusual suggestion of sharing the realm, but by then he had lost the struggle<br />

and his brother would have none of it. Looking at Ottoman succession practices<br />

over the long run, it is dear that they continued, until the seventeenth<br />

century, the Inner Asian tradition of giving each heir a sphere of influence<br />

within the family dominions and a chance for future rulership, but adapted that<br />

tradition<br />

― 138 ―<br />

to their own vision of a strong central government. An appanage was no more than<br />

a princely fief; once one of the princes reached the throne to replace their<br />

father, the others would be dispossessed and, after Orhan at least, eliminated.<br />

No "net-eponymous" dynasty emerged out of Osman's clan. Over the long run, the<br />

Ottomans proved to be better students of history than their competitors, not<br />

just in the policy of succession but also in the way they dealt with other real<br />

and potential challenges to centralization of power, as we shall see next.<br />

Into the Limelight and the Rise of Tensions<br />

If the Ottomans had grown relatively removed from the limelight of<br />

"international politics," they found the opportunity to catch up when Byzantine<br />

factionalism pulled them into a wider orbit and took them across the Sea of<br />

Marmara into Thrace. Among the Turco-Muslim principalities of western Anatolia,<br />

it was the House of Aydin whose support was first sought by Kantakouzenos, one<br />

of the main contenders to the imperial title. Eventually, two other<br />

principalities, flanking the southern side of the Sea of Marmara, became deeply<br />

involved in the factional strife of the empire. These were the chiefdom of Orhan<br />

to the southeast and that of the Karasi to the southwest of Marmara facing<br />

Thrace.<br />

Very little is known about the history of the Karasi emirate.[49] The Ottoman<br />

chronicles are particularly muddled in those sections that cover the relations<br />

between these two neighboring rivals. One thing is certain, however, and of<br />

major significance for early Ottoman history: the Karasi had a group of<br />

particularly accomplished and renowned warriors who could teach the Ottomans a<br />

thing or two about crossing over into Thrace, which presented premium raiding<br />

territory. Once Orhan eliminated the House of Karasi and annexed its realm,<br />

those warriors passed into his service and provided valuable military leadership<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!