03.04.2013 Views

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

Between Two Worlds Kafadar.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

emperor Kantakouzenos (1341-55) and Aydinoglu Umur Beg as it is reported again<br />

in the Dusturname . After a meeting where the emperor asks the gazi not to<br />

destroy his empire and the latter tells the Byzantine ruler not to be sad, our<br />

source reports: "They talked, wished each other well, and became brothers."[26]<br />

So serious is Umur Beg about this brotherhood that he turns down Kantakouzenos's<br />

offer of his daughter's hand as if marrying her would constitute incest: "The<br />

tekvur is my brother, his daughter my daughter; our religion does not permit<br />

this sort of thing."[27] He does not budge even later when the beautiful<br />

princess practically throws herself at his feet and says: "take me, and let me<br />

be your slave."[28] He hides his face in his hands to conceal his sorrow, but a<br />

gazi must observe a code of conduct; he cannot do certain things once a<br />

brotherly relationship is established even if that brother is the ruler of the<br />

infidels.<br />

My intention here is not to provide more evidence of cooperation between<br />

Anatolian Muslim warriors and Byzantines, the prevalence of which is beyond<br />

doubt. The point is rather to show that the literature produced by or among the<br />

gazis to glorify their deeds did not find it contradictory to present their gazi<br />

protagonists in cooperation with Christians. If such was the gazi mentality, why<br />

should we define it to have been otherwise?<br />

We should not, on the other hand, assume that because the gazis were able to<br />

embrace the infidels, they would proudly have all such embraces<br />

― 71 ―<br />

announced and recorded. Their lack of inhibition regarding cooperation with the<br />

infidels was certainly not boundless and should not be romanticized. There were<br />

times when the gazis would sooner forget any alliances they may have made with<br />

their Christian neighbors. Orhan's wedding to the daughter of a local Bithynian<br />

ruler, traditionally dated to ca. 1299, is merrily reported in Ottoman<br />

chronicles, but there is total silence concerning his marriage with the daughter<br />

of Kantakouzenos (the princess Umur Beg had turned down). Orhan's marriage was<br />

part of a relatively protracted period of cooperation between the Ottomans and<br />

the Kantakouzenos faction in the Byzantine Empire that turned out to be a<br />

turning point in Ottoman expansion toward southeastern Europe; and that whole<br />

period represents a lacuna in Ottoman histories, which prefer to present a very<br />

different scenario of the early military achievements in Thrace, as we shall see<br />

below. The Dusturname , on the other hand, chronicling the story of a long<br />

defunct polity, is not inhibited in dealing with the pact between Kantakouzenos<br />

and the House of Aydin.[29]<br />

It is not always easy to distinguish between these warrior epics and<br />

hagiographies of holy men, just as it is at times difficult to differentiate a<br />

warrior from a dervish or vice versa. These difficulties are particularly<br />

manifest in the vita of Sari Saltuk , who seems to have crossed the line between<br />

the two vocations with particular ease.<br />

The Saltukname was compiled by Ebu'l-hayr-i Rumi , who traveled extensively to<br />

collect oral traditions concerning Sari Saltuk , a legendary figure of the<br />

thirteenth century, on behalf of Prince Cem (d. 1495). Completed ca. 1480, the<br />

book doubtlessly contains a good deal of earlier material. This work is even<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!