convergence
convergence
convergence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Sullivan<br />
182<br />
Guatemala and Honduras, El Salvador, Panama and Costa Rica, indeed all Central<br />
America, are currently at risk of being caught in the “cross-border” spillover of Mexico’s<br />
drug wars. Controlling these border zones is key to transnational gangs and cartels.<br />
Los Zetas, for example, not only train in sparsely populated border areas, they seek to<br />
sustain military control of the frontier and adjoining terrain on both sides of Mexico’s<br />
southern border between Chiapas and Guatemala. 48<br />
The informal economies that have emerged in Latin American border zones demonstrate<br />
the transition of states that is emerging from the twin engines of globalization and the<br />
information age. The shift of government authority from the state (or in cases where the state<br />
has always been weak, the rise of criminal governance) to dark side criminal actors/criminal<br />
netwarriors is a consequence of globalization impacting loose frontier economies that serve<br />
as in-between zones for illicit goods within a common regional network. This exploitation<br />
of regional economic circuits, albeit illicit, illustrates the transition into a reconfiguration of<br />
power within the state, where traditional informal networks link with globalized forms of<br />
illicit commerce to create a new base of power.<br />
Criminal Enclaves<br />
In Mexico and parts of Central America, cartels and gangs have gained control over specific<br />
plazas ranging from a few city blocks to entire states or subnational regions. Exploiting weak<br />
state capacity in urban slums or rural border zones 49 either from the aftermath of civil war<br />
(Central America) or during the transition from one party rule (Mexico), criminal mafias of<br />
various stripes have exploited the vacuum of power. In Mexico, for example, the drug-trafficking<br />
organizations were traditionally moderated by the ruling party, the Partido Revolucionario<br />
Institucional (PRI). The end of the PRI monopoly on power allowed the cartels to seek new<br />
business and political arrangements. Cartels, now free from the influence of the PRI, could<br />
strike independent arrangements with local political actors. This freedom converged with the<br />
increasing globalization of crime. As a result, organized crime could then establish boundaries<br />
for the authorities, not the other way around. 50<br />
Drug cartels and criminal gangs are challenging the legitimacy and solvency of the state<br />
at the local, state, and national levels in Mexico and Central America. As Max Manwaring<br />
stipulated, these state challengers are applying the “Sullivan-Bunker Cocktail,” where nonstate<br />
actors challenge the de facto sovereignty of nations. 51 In Manwaring’s interpretation, gangs and<br />
irregular networked attackers can challenge nation-states by using complicity, intimidation,<br />
and corruption to subtly co-opt and control individual bureaucrats and gain effective control<br />
over a given enclave.<br />
Essentially, the cartels and their networked 3 GEN gang affiliates exploit weak zones of<br />
governance, expanding their criminal turf into effective areas of control. They start by corrupting<br />
weak officials, co-opting the institutions of government and civil society through violence<br />
and bribes. They attack police, military forces, judges, mayors, and journalists to leverage their<br />
sway, communicate their primacy through information operations, and cultivate alternative<br />
social memes adapting environmental and social conditions toward their goals. Then they