convergence
convergence
convergence
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Combating Transnational Organized Crime<br />
extortion, smuggling persons, and other crimes. As the Mexican government disrupted transnational<br />
criminal organizations, these groups increasingly fought for market share, escalating<br />
violence against one another, targeting Mexican security forces using military-like weapons,<br />
tactics, and techniques, and endangering the civilian population in the process. Mexican<br />
criminal organizations also expanded their operations into Central America and have reached<br />
into the United States, penetrating cities such as Chicago, Detroit, and Atlanta, far from the<br />
border. The diversification of criminal activity and the increase in violence forced the Mexican<br />
military to assume even more prominent roles, while simultaneously transforming themselves<br />
to become more capable of protecting the public from hybrid, irregular threats.<br />
The Way Forward<br />
As the spectrum demonstrates, DOD tailors the type of support it provides to law enforcement,<br />
other U.S. Government agencies, and foreign partners. Given the ever-evolving character<br />
of transnational organized crime, this adaptability allows DOD to have significant strategic<br />
impact in a range of circumstances. There are risks, however, of overextension and redundancy.<br />
Providing support across a wide spectrum of efforts demands that DOD carefully prioritize<br />
the specific activities it undertakes—a prescient requirement as resources shrink.<br />
DOD has taken important steps toward setting clear priorities for its actions against<br />
transnational organized crime. The Department’s Counternarcotics and Global Threats Strategy,<br />
derived from national strategic and military guidance, is a key departure point for how<br />
DOD combats transnational organized crime. But this strategy is not exhaustive. There are<br />
manifestations of organized crime such as cybercrime, financial crimes, and state-sponsored<br />
illicit activities that DOD has not yet fully integrated into its strategy and policy development.<br />
Doing so will be critical to ensuring that the resources expended against criminal organizations<br />
have maximum strategic impact.<br />
The Department must also link its efforts against transnational organized crime with other<br />
national security priorities. The strategies and policies created and implemented to combat<br />
the threats posed by criminal networks should be connected to other focal points for DOD<br />
and the U.S. Government—particularly cybersecurity, counterterrorism, counterproliferation,<br />
building partner capacity, and strengthening governance. Holistic approaches that recognize<br />
transnational organized crime not as a stovepiped problem but as a nefarious feature of the<br />
global security environment that touches the whole world and impacts a multitude of vital<br />
U.S. interests are the types most likely to succeed over the long term.<br />
DOD understands that the most important prerequisite to success against transnational<br />
organized crime is organizational flexibility and adaptability. As the character of transnational<br />
criminal organizations continues to change and DOD and its U.S. Government partners hone<br />
their understanding of the types of national security threats these groups pose, we must be<br />
able to shift our strategies, priorities, policies, operations, and tactics for combating them. To<br />
fail in our mission because DOD is unable to organize itself properly is unacceptable, yet it<br />
remains a risk if we do not assume the characteristics of flexible, flat organizations.<br />
241