06.04.2013 Views

convergence

convergence

convergence

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Picard<br />

50<br />

Table 3. Comparison of Problem Definitions<br />

Name of the<br />

Problem<br />

Global Black<br />

Markets<br />

Transnational<br />

Organizational<br />

Crime<br />

Illicit Trade<br />

(Narrow)<br />

Illicit Trade<br />

(Broad)<br />

Deviant<br />

Globalization<br />

Nutshell View of<br />

the Problem<br />

Imbalance<br />

between supply<br />

and demand<br />

Organized crime<br />

benefits from<br />

globalization<br />

Imbalance<br />

between supply<br />

and demand<br />

Globalization and<br />

the legal business<br />

infrastructure are<br />

enablers of illicit<br />

activities<br />

Globalization and<br />

the legal business<br />

infrastructure are<br />

enablers of illicit<br />

activities<br />

Predatory<br />

Crimes<br />

Marketbased<br />

Crimes<br />

Commercial<br />

Crimes Condition<br />

No Yes No None<br />

Yes Yes No<br />

No Yes No<br />

Transnational<br />

crimes only<br />

Can be<br />

restricted<br />

to flows of<br />

goods<br />

No Yes Yes None<br />

Yes Yes Yes Transnational<br />

For measurement purposes, the most practical definition is the one used for Global Black<br />

Markets, which considers only one category of profit-driven crimes without any condition.<br />

The condition of transnationality used for Transnational Organized Crime and Deviant<br />

Globalization increases the complexity of the classification and measurement as well. One<br />

could take the view that a majority of profit-driven crimes have one or more transnational<br />

features, in which case the condition can be essentially ignored. However, this is clearly not<br />

true for predatory crimes, and predatory crimes with an obvious transnational component<br />

have received much attention lately. While the rest of the chapter essentially focuses on global<br />

markets, we note that commercial crimes in particular deserve more attention.<br />

While there are many subtleties to and implications of Naylor’s theory that are outside the<br />

scope of this chapter, let us make a few remarks. The different categories of offenses can be connected.<br />

“In some cases explicitly criminal acts and inherently legal ones are embedded together<br />

in a matrix of economic activity to such a degree that the two, while theoretically distinct, are<br />

mutually interdependent.” For example, illicit markets can be used to monetize the proceeds<br />

of predatory crimes, such as cargo theft, and certain offenses may overlap different categories:<br />

for example, intellectual property crime involves the misappropriation of intellectual capital<br />

by the counterfeiter (predatory crime), the sale of an illegal good (market-based crime), and a<br />

commercial crime if the IP-infringing good is sold to an unsuspecting customer. Therefore, a<br />

distinction is made between primary offenses, which is the primary act generating the money,<br />

and secondary offenses. However, as the complexity of global supply chains allows legitimate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!