convergence
convergence
convergence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Wechsler and Barnabo<br />
threat to national security.” 5 It directs the government to “build, balance, and integrate the tools<br />
of American power to combat transnational organized crime and related threats to national<br />
security—and to urge our foreign partners to do the same.” 6<br />
The strategy is a call to action: it compels the U.S. Government, including DOD, to reframe<br />
and refocus its efforts in combating TOC. Importantly, the strategy addresses organized<br />
crime and drug trafficking as increasingly intertwined threats, laying the foundation for a broad<br />
approach to global crime that rightfully retains a core focus on counternarcotics but widens<br />
the aperture by recognizing the diversification of global criminal activity and its relationship<br />
with other irregular threats.<br />
Transnational criminal organizations are the essence of a networked threat. Not only are<br />
criminal entities themselves networked, but they also rely on support networks—transportation,<br />
financial, human capital, logistics, and communications—to enable their activities. It<br />
follows that U.S. Government efforts to combat organized crime should emphasize counternetwork<br />
approaches. Disrupting networks, particularly those associated with financial flows—<br />
vital enablers of any criminal activity—through multifaceted targeting of key network nodes,<br />
be they individuals, institutions, or even specific trafficking routes, can have a broad positive<br />
impact on degrading criminal organizations. Employing these counternetwork approaches,<br />
however, requires the government to assume the characteristics of a network, integrating the<br />
capabilities of diverse interagency stakeholders and adjusting approaches as rapidly as the adversary<br />
changes tactics. Only when our policy responses and actions in the field are as adaptive<br />
as the threat will we see true progress against transnational organized crime.<br />
DOD’s Supporting and Evolving Role<br />
DOD supports law enforcement, other U.S. agencies, and foreign partners in combating<br />
transnational organized crime. The U.S. Government and its partners address transnational<br />
criminal threats primarily through law enforcement channels, capacity-building efforts, diplomacy<br />
with key partner states, intelligence and analytical efforts, and the use of innovative policy<br />
tools such as counterthreat finance capabilities. Because it is in a supporting role, DOD rarely<br />
leads these efforts, but it offers unique capabilities and resources that strengthen overall U.S.<br />
Government approaches against criminal networks. As the threat has morphed, however, there<br />
have been important instances of law enforcement agencies supporting DOD operations. The<br />
Afghanistan Threat Finance Cell, for example, is run by law enforcement entities and provides<br />
direct support to military operations in Afghanistan. Support that cuts both ways—from<br />
DOD to law enforcement and from law enforcement to the military—is a strategically important<br />
evolution in how the U.S. Government organizes to combat TOC.<br />
The Department of Defense can provide intelligence and equipment to support law<br />
enforcement efforts against transnational criminal organizations. DOD’s focus, however,<br />
has typically been on counternarcotics missions—historically in the Western Hemisphere<br />
and over the past decade in Afghanistan and the surrounding region. As described above, the<br />
nexus among criminals, terrorists, and insurgents is increasingly visible as our adversaries forge<br />
hybrid organizational and operational models, suggesting that counterterrorism initiatives in<br />
the future should incorporate a greater emphasis on combating the nexus with TOC.<br />
236