05.06.2013 Views

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.8 T<strong>in</strong> (Sn) M<strong>in</strong>erals 173<br />

conta<strong>in</strong> several t<strong>in</strong>-produc<strong>in</strong>g districts, but there is little evidence of how early these<br />

were exploited. The first direct evidence for m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Erzgebirge dates to the<br />

close of the twelfth century. Penhallurick (1986) addresses the question by stat<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

“. . . but t<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g there must have been <strong>in</strong> the Erzebirge dur<strong>in</strong>g the Bronze Age, for<br />

without it, the achievements of European metallurgists before the discovery of the<br />

Cornish ores cannot be expla<strong>in</strong>ed.” McGeehan-Liritzis and Taylor (1987) have suggested<br />

that Yugoslavian t<strong>in</strong> deposits may have been a Bronze Age source. However,<br />

until the basic geology of these deposits is understood <strong>in</strong> the light of requirements<br />

for Bronze Age exploitation, such suggestions are highly speculative.<br />

A source of t<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Taurus Mounta<strong>in</strong>s of Turkey for the Bronze Age of the<br />

eastern Mediterranean has been widely argued (Yener and Ozbal 1987; Yener et al.<br />

1989). However, <strong>in</strong> the company of Yener, Ozbal, and others on the Yener team, the<br />

author was able to visit this deposit, enter the m<strong>in</strong>e, study the local geology, and<br />

assess the potential of this deposit as a source of Bronze Age t<strong>in</strong>. No cassiterite was<br />

observed anywhere. Although the “m<strong>in</strong>e” was occupied by Bronze Age peoples, it<br />

has much more the characteristics of a natural cave. For a summary of the history of<br />

the <strong>in</strong>vestigations of ancient m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Turkey see Kaptan (1995).<br />

The latest work on t<strong>in</strong> deposits <strong>in</strong> Egypt and the Czech Republic is reported <strong>in</strong><br />

Rapp et al. (2000; Fig. 7.9). Until recently, many scholars have assumed that the<br />

Erzebirge, Czech Republic cassiterite deposits, could not have been exploited prior<br />

to the last two millennia. However, see Bouzek et al. (1989) and Taylor (1983). At<br />

the time of writ<strong>in</strong>g, the actual sources of the t<strong>in</strong> for eastern Mediterranean and Near<br />

Eastern Bronze Age metallurgy are not accurately known. For a brief summary of<br />

aspects of this problem, see Muhly (1985). Unlike the Eastern Mediterranean region<br />

the sources for t<strong>in</strong> [as well as copper] for the Bronze Age of Ch<strong>in</strong>a are well known<br />

(Chang 1980; Needham 1999). There are 28 copper and 16 t<strong>in</strong> deposits with<strong>in</strong> a<br />

350 km radius of the great Late Shang capital of Y<strong>in</strong>xu at Anyang.<br />

Fig. 7.9 Cassiterite <strong>in</strong> riffles,<br />

M<strong>in</strong>e Mueilha, Egyptian<br />

Eastern Desert

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!