05.06.2013 Views

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 M<strong>in</strong>eral Structure 19<br />

understand<strong>in</strong>g of crystal structures and bond<strong>in</strong>g is unnecessary <strong>in</strong> the context of this<br />

book, so only a brief <strong>in</strong>troduction is provided.<br />

There are three basic types of chemical bonds: metallic, covalent, and ionic. The<br />

metallic bond is responsible for the cohesion of a metal. Metals readily lose their<br />

outer electrons, so the geometry of crystal structures is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the manner<br />

<strong>in</strong> which the positively charged atoms can be “packed” <strong>in</strong> space. The detached electrons<br />

dispersed among the atoms are freely mobile. This mobility is responsible for<br />

the good electrical and thermal conductivity of metals.<br />

The most stable configuration for an atom is one <strong>in</strong> which the outer shell of electrons<br />

is completely filled (see Sect. 2.3 for a description of the structure of atoms).<br />

One way to achieve this stable configuration is for two or more atoms to share<br />

electrons <strong>in</strong> their outer shells. The best m<strong>in</strong>eralogical example is diamond, <strong>in</strong> which<br />

every carbon atom is surrounded by four other carbon atoms, each shar<strong>in</strong>g one electron<br />

with the central atom. This arrangement is repeated throughout the structure.<br />

This type of bond is called covalent.<br />

Another way for an atom to achieve a completely filled outer shell of electrons<br />

is for it to ga<strong>in</strong> or lose the precise number of electrons required to reach this<br />

configuration. A neutral chlor<strong>in</strong>e atom lacks one electron for a filled outer shell.<br />

By accept<strong>in</strong>g one additional electron it becomes a stable, negatively charged ion<br />

with a filled outer shell. Sodium has only one electron <strong>in</strong> its outermost shell.<br />

By giv<strong>in</strong>g up this electron sodium has its outermost shell filled and becomes a<br />

stable positively charged ion. Sodium and chlor<strong>in</strong>e ions comb<strong>in</strong>e readily to give<br />

an ionic structure, bonded by electrostatic attraction. Each ion is surrounded by<br />

ions of opposite charge, the number be<strong>in</strong>g determ<strong>in</strong>ed by their relative sizes. This<br />

ionic bond<strong>in</strong>g is the most common bond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>erals. Practically all m<strong>in</strong>erals,<br />

except native elements (such as gold or copper) and sulfides, are predom<strong>in</strong>antly<br />

ionic.<br />

The hardness of a m<strong>in</strong>eral is def<strong>in</strong>ed as its resistance to scratch<strong>in</strong>g. Hardness was<br />

quantified by the Austrian m<strong>in</strong>eralogist Friedrich Mohs, who proposed the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scale of relative hardness <strong>in</strong> 1922: (1) talc, (2) gypsum, (3) calcite, (4) fluorite,<br />

(5) apatite, (6) orthoclase, (7) quartz, (8) topaz, (9) corundum, (10) diamond. Each<br />

of the m<strong>in</strong>erals lower <strong>in</strong> the scale can be scratched by those higher <strong>in</strong> the scale.<br />

The scale is not l<strong>in</strong>ear; <strong>in</strong> absolute hardness, diamond is three orders of magnitude<br />

harder than talc. Hardness does vary with crystallographic direction <strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>eral.<br />

Hardness is an important diagnostic property <strong>in</strong> the field identification of m<strong>in</strong>erals.<br />

In addition to the m<strong>in</strong>erals <strong>in</strong> the scale, the follow<strong>in</strong>g materials serve as handy<br />

references for the hardness (on the Mohs scale): f<strong>in</strong>gernail: 2–2.5; copper co<strong>in</strong>:<br />

approximately 3; pocket knife: 5–5.5; w<strong>in</strong>dow glass: 5.5; steel file: 6.5.<br />

Because there is a general l<strong>in</strong>k between hardness and chemical composition, the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g generalizations can be made: (1) most hydrous m<strong>in</strong>erals are relatively<br />

soft (H < 5), (2) halides, carbonates, sulfates, and phosphates are also relatively soft<br />

(H < 5.5), (3) most sulfides are relatively soft (H < 5) with pyrite be<strong>in</strong>g an exception<br />

(H < 6 to 6.5), (4) most anhydrous oxides and silicates are hard (H > 5.5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!