05.06.2013 Views

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

Natural Science in Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 9 Pigments and Colorants<br />

Maya Blue. Maya Blue is a bluish-green pigment that has been found associated<br />

with Mayan artifacts <strong>in</strong> Central America. Its use appears to have extended <strong>in</strong>to the Colonial<br />

Period (Tagle et al. 1990). Maya Blue is a mixture of m<strong>in</strong>erals and <strong>in</strong>digo – a blue<br />

dye obta<strong>in</strong>ed from various plants. The m<strong>in</strong>eral constituents are palygorskite (formerly<br />

called attapulgite) and sepiolite (also called meerschaum). The pigment is notable not<br />

only for its association with specific archaeological contexts, but also for its unique<br />

physical properties. Maya Blue is known to have survived the extremely harsh environmental<br />

conditions of the ra<strong>in</strong> forest. It is also remarkably resistant to alkalis and all but<br />

hot concentrated acids (Gettens and Stout 1966).<br />

Maya Blue appears to have had special cultural significance for the Maya beyond<br />

its decorative qualities. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the sixteenth century bishop and explorer<br />

Diego de Landa, the Maya pa<strong>in</strong>ted their victims before sacrific<strong>in</strong>g them on a stone<br />

altar. Maya Blue was employed extensively on ceremonial objects and temple<br />

murals (Arnold and Bohor 1975).<br />

There has been considerable debate regard<strong>in</strong>g the precise nature of Maya Blue.<br />

Most scientists now agree that this pigment has a substantial clay component. However,<br />

there is no consensus regard<strong>in</strong>g the source of the pigment’s blue color. There<br />

are two theories regard<strong>in</strong>g the source of color <strong>in</strong> Maya Blue. Some scientists have<br />

suggested that Maya Blue is a lake consist<strong>in</strong>g of an <strong>in</strong>digo-sta<strong>in</strong>ed attapulgite clay.<br />

However, the marked stability of Maya Blue is <strong>in</strong>consistent with the notorious <strong>in</strong>stability<br />

of modern manufactured lakes, and, until recently, there was some question<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g the availability of attapulgite clay to the Maya (Arnold and Bohor 1975).<br />

However, possible sources of attapulgite have now been identified <strong>in</strong> Guatemala<br />

and the northern Yucatan Pen<strong>in</strong>sula (Folan 1969).<br />

Research has been conducted regard<strong>in</strong>g the possible effects of heat process<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

a possible explanation for the apparent stability of Maya Blue. It has been suggested<br />

that heat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>digo-sta<strong>in</strong>ed attapulgite at moderate temperatures for several days<br />

will result <strong>in</strong> a relatively stable compound (Van Olphen 1966; Littmann 1982).<br />

An alternative theory regard<strong>in</strong>g the color source <strong>in</strong> Maya Blue is that the pigment<br />

derives its color from iron. This possibility was presented early <strong>in</strong> the Maya Blue<br />

debate by Gettens and Stout (1966). However, this theory has been disregarded<br />

because of the low concentrations of metallic impurities found <strong>in</strong> Maya Blue. Nevertheless,<br />

some scientists have cont<strong>in</strong>ued to explore the possible role of metal compounds<br />

<strong>in</strong> Maya Blue (Jose-Yacaman et al. 1996).<br />

Lapis Lazuli/<strong>Natural</strong> Ultramar<strong>in</strong>e. Although lapis lazuli, the m<strong>in</strong>eral lazurite,<br />

also known as ultramar<strong>in</strong>e, (Na,Ca) 8 (AlSiO 4 ) 6 (SO 4 ,S,Cl) 2 , was available to the<br />

ancient Egyptians, there is no evidence that it was used as a blue pigment until much<br />

later. Lapis was expensive, and its application as a pigment required process<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

levigation of the powdered material. The result<strong>in</strong>g yield would have been very low,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g lapis far too expensive to utilize <strong>in</strong> this manner (Lucas 1989).<br />

The earliest known use of natural ultramar<strong>in</strong>e as a pa<strong>in</strong>t pigment is found <strong>in</strong> wall<br />

pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs at the cave temples of Bamiyan <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan (sixth to seventh century<br />

CE). Ultramar<strong>in</strong>e is also known from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs of the tenth to eleventh<br />

centuries and from Indian murals as early as the eleventh century. In Europe, ultramar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

found favor <strong>in</strong> illum<strong>in</strong>ated manuscripts of the fourteenth to mid-fifteenth

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!