08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Among the many genocide scholars who have contributed essays to the series over<br />

the years are: Howard Adelman, Alex Alvarez, Paul R. Bartrop, Israel W. Charny, Vahakn<br />

Dadrian, James Dunn, Barbara Harff, Herbert Hirsch, Richard Hovannisian, Curt Jonassohn,<br />

Leo Kuper, James Mace, Eric Markusen, Martin Mennecke, Rubina Peroomian,<br />

Rudolph J. Rummel, William Schabas, Roger Smith, Greg Stanton, and Samuel Totten.<br />

<strong>Genocide</strong> and Politicide Project. Based at the University <strong>of</strong> Maryland-College Park,<br />

this project is directed by political scientists Barbara Harff (b. 1942), pr<strong>of</strong>essor emerita at<br />

the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis. Its foundation is a data base that includes information<br />

on a broad range <strong>of</strong> genocide and politicides perpetrated between 1955 and 2002—<br />

some fifty in all, which have engulfed the lives <strong>of</strong> at least 12 million and as many as<br />

22 million noncombatants, more than all <strong>of</strong> the victims <strong>of</strong> internal and international wars<br />

since 1945. The Web site <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Genocide</strong> and Politicide Project notes that the following<br />

questions cum guidelines were used to help distinguish cases <strong>of</strong> genocide and politicide<br />

from other kinds <strong>of</strong> killings that generally occur during civil conflicts: “(1) Is there complicity<br />

by the state (or, in the case <strong>of</strong> civil war, either <strong>of</strong> the contending authorities) in<br />

actions undertaken that endanger human life?; (2) Is there evidence, even if circumstantial,<br />

<strong>of</strong> intent on the part <strong>of</strong> authorities to isolate or single out group members for mistreatment?;<br />

(3) Are victims members <strong>of</strong> an identifiable group?; (4) Are there policies and<br />

practices that cause prolonged mass suffering; and (5) Do the actions committed pose a<br />

threat to the survival <strong>of</strong> the group?”<br />

<strong>Genocide</strong> by Attrition. A phrase that refers to the deliberate denial <strong>of</strong> adequate water,<br />

foodstuffs, and medical attention to a specific group <strong>of</strong> people by a perpetrator for the express<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> contributing to the targeted group’s demise. This phrase/concept was employed<br />

by various genocide scholars to explain a large part <strong>of</strong> the deaths <strong>of</strong> black Africans in Darfur,<br />

Sudan, who have been attacked, raped, killed, and run <strong>of</strong>f their land by Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Sudan (GOS) troops and the Janjaweed (Arab militia) between 2003 and today (late 2007).<br />

The deaths attributed to genocide by attrition are those that resulted from starvation, dehydration,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> medical care, and similar debilitating, and <strong>of</strong>ten deadly conditions. In carrying<br />

out death and destruction, the GOS and Janjaweed stole the foodstuffs <strong>of</strong> the black<br />

Africans, poisoned their wells by tossing dead animal carcasses and dead human bodies into<br />

the wells, and chased the survivors into the wilds <strong>of</strong> the desolate mountains and deserts <strong>of</strong><br />

Darfur. The GOS and Janjaweed have also purposely prevented foodstuffs, medicine and<br />

other supplies crucial to survival from entering many internally displaced camps where the<br />

black Africans have sought sanctuary, thus increasing the death toll.<br />

<strong>Genocide</strong>, Causes <strong>of</strong>. As with all social sciences, establishing causality is not a scientific<br />

endeavor. Only with hindsight is some kind <strong>of</strong> connection visible between an event<br />

and what transpired beforehand. The best one can do is to determine antecedents and circumstances<br />

that point toward the event under consideration. This is no less true when<br />

analyzing the origins <strong>of</strong> a particular genocide. Whether one can ultimately arrive at a<br />

common denominator <strong>of</strong> causes true for all genocides remains dubious. Most frequently<br />

(though not always), genocides take place in times <strong>of</strong> war. Of course, there has to be a prevailing<br />

ideology (or at least a mood or attitude) that demonizes a target group for elimination.<br />

Times <strong>of</strong> extreme economic stress can contribute to the outbreak <strong>of</strong> mass violence.<br />

Genocidal violence is more likely to erupt where there is an absence <strong>of</strong> democracy at<br />

home and international disinterest. Another condition that may encourage genocidal<br />

thought and action is a radical imbalance <strong>of</strong> power between the génocidaires and the<br />

GENOCIDE, CAUSES OF<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!