08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PEOPLE OF INTEGRITY<br />

330<br />

Peace Prize winner Lester B. Pearson (1897–1972), a longtime diplomat, a former prime<br />

minister <strong>of</strong> Canada, and the individual who led the effort to establish a peacekeeping<br />

force—the first UN Emergency Force—during the Suez Canal crisis. The Pearson Center<br />

is recognized as an innovator in the field. Established in 1994 by the government <strong>of</strong><br />

Canada, it is a division <strong>of</strong> the Canadian Institute <strong>of</strong> Strategic Studies.<br />

People <strong>of</strong> Integrity (Kinyarwandan, Inyangamugayo). People <strong>of</strong> integrity is the term<br />

used to describe those community-elected judges heading up gacaca courts all across<br />

Rwanda <strong>of</strong> alleged perpetrators <strong>of</strong> the 1994 Rwandan genocide. The Inyangamugayo<br />

(“uncorrupted” or “people <strong>of</strong> integrity”) are those individuals who their fellow community<br />

members view as trustworthy, honest, and fair—and whose hands are not stained by taking<br />

part in the genocide.<br />

The gacaca courts are nonadversarial hearings based on precolonial village assemblies,<br />

in which the most respected members <strong>of</strong> the village (“people <strong>of</strong> integrity”) arbitrated judgments.<br />

In the aftermath <strong>of</strong> the 1994 genocide, an adaptation <strong>of</strong> the traditional gacaca,<br />

introduced in 2001, was intended to both speed up prosecutions and hold the hearings in<br />

the exact places where the crimes were committed, thus allowing all <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong><br />

the local population to attend and take part in the judicial process.<br />

The “people <strong>of</strong> integrity” are tasked with collecting information about the accused, collecting<br />

the names and opening cases on the newly accused, calling and hearing the gacaca<br />

cases in their locale, and making decisions, based on the evidence collected and testimony<br />

heard, as to whether an individual deserves to be freed, to be sent or returned to prison,<br />

or to have his/her prison term reduced.<br />

Permanent Five. See P-5.<br />

Personnel Continuities. A phrase referring to a perpetrator group’s use <strong>of</strong> either the<br />

same personnel in carrying out different genocides or the lessons learned in one genocide<br />

by a perpetrator group and put to use in another genocide by the same perpetrator group.<br />

A classic example <strong>of</strong> this concept put into practice is that <strong>of</strong> the Germans who perpetrated<br />

the Herero genocide in 1904, the Germans’ involvement in various ways in the<br />

Ottoman Turk genocide <strong>of</strong> the Armenians between 1915 and 1923, and the German’s<br />

perpetration <strong>of</strong> the Holocaust (1933–1945).<br />

P-5. The five permanent members (the United States, France, Great Britain, Russia,<br />

and China) <strong>of</strong> the UN Security Council.<br />

The original permanent members <strong>of</strong> the United Nations (the United States, Great<br />

Britain, France, the Soviet Union [USSR], and the Republic <strong>of</strong> China) were among the<br />

victorious nations <strong>of</strong> World War II. In 1971, the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong> China was given the<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> China’s seat in the United Nations via a UN General Assembly Resolution.<br />

Upon the dissolution <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union in 1991, the Russian Federation was given the<br />

seat <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union.<br />

The significance <strong>of</strong> being a permanent member <strong>of</strong> the Security Council is due to two<br />

major facts: first, each permanent member state—and only each permanent member<br />

state—has veto powers, which can be used to void any resolution. A single veto outweighs<br />

the majority vote. Technically, the vote does not constitute a veto but rather a nay<br />

vote; in reality, though, the nay vote is a veto and automatically “kills” any resolution;<br />

second, the Security Council constitutes the most powerful organ <strong>of</strong> the United Nations<br />

and has the vitally significant mandate <strong>of</strong> maintaining peace and security between<br />

nations. Unlike other organs <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, which only make recommendations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!