08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL RIGHTS<br />

220<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> movement and residence; freedom <strong>of</strong> expression and opinion; peaceful assembly<br />

and association; and the centrality <strong>of</strong> family and marriage.<br />

Unfortunately, the reality <strong>of</strong> the contemporary political world, including both the<br />

United Nations itself and the signatory nations to the ICCPR, is that, despite the force<br />

<strong>of</strong> international law, the ICCPR has little, if any, impact on the general international<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> human rights, most especially in totalitarian nation-states under dictatorial<br />

regimes. The latter is true due to the fact that such nation-states more <strong>of</strong>ten than<br />

not ignore pleas from international human rights organizations and the international<br />

community to halt their egregious human rights violations and figure that in the long<br />

run they can do as they wish as few will effectively challenge their actions, let alone<br />

their rule.<br />

International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Similar<br />

to the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the<br />

ICESCR was adopted in 1966 and affirmed in international law in 1976. It, too, recognizes<br />

“the inherent dignity and inalienable rights <strong>of</strong> all members <strong>of</strong> the human family” as<br />

“the foundation <strong>of</strong> freedom, justice, and peace in the world,” but directs its focus on the<br />

three areas <strong>of</strong> economics, social, and cultural rights. It affirms the rights <strong>of</strong> workers to<br />

receive a fair wage for their work; the right to establish unions; the right <strong>of</strong> families, especially<br />

mothers and children, to protection; the right <strong>of</strong> all human beings to an adequate<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> living regarding food, clothing, and shelter; freedom from hunger; the right to<br />

both physical and mental health; the importance <strong>of</strong> access to education; and the rights <strong>of</strong><br />

persons to access their cultural heritage and derive benefit from scientific achievements.<br />

Signatory nations are expected, at the invitation <strong>of</strong> the secretary-general <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Nations, to submit reports to the Economic and Social Council <strong>of</strong> their present achievements<br />

and future goals.<br />

International Covenant on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrimination<br />

(ICEAFRD). Adopted by the United Nations in 1965, the ICEAFRD entered into<br />

the force <strong>of</strong> international law in 1969. The ICEAFRD resolves “to adopt all necessary<br />

measures for speedily eliminating racial discrimination in all its forms and manifestations,<br />

and to prevent and combat racist doctrines and practices in order to promote<br />

understanding between races and to build an international community free from all<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> racial segregation and racial discrimination.” Signatory parties are, therefore,<br />

expected to practice no forms <strong>of</strong> racial discrimination, to encourage other nationstates<br />

to eliminate such discrimination, to condemn such where it exists, and to educate<br />

their own constituencies about discrimination and ways to eliminate such.<br />

International Criminal Court (ICC). The idea for the establishment <strong>of</strong> an international<br />

criminal court reaches back into the nineteenth century when Gustav Moynier<br />

(1826–1910), one <strong>of</strong> the c<strong>of</strong>ounders <strong>of</strong> the International Committee <strong>of</strong> the Red Cross,<br />

suggested the need for such a court to uphold the Geneva Convention <strong>of</strong> 1864. From that<br />

point onward, the idea for such a court was raised many times (e.g., during the course <strong>of</strong><br />

the Versailles Peace Conference <strong>of</strong> 1919, by the Committee <strong>of</strong> Jurists in 1920 under the<br />

auspices <strong>of</strong> the League <strong>of</strong> Nations, several times during World War II, and in the<br />

post–World War II years), but to no avail. It was not until the late 1980s and early to mid-<br />

1990s that actual headway was made in establishing such a court, “helped” along no doubt<br />

by the genocidal atrocities that were being perpetrated, first, in the former Yugoslavia, and<br />

then in Rwanda in 1994.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!