08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON INTERVENTION AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY<br />

and consequences <strong>of</strong> genocide and to advance policy studies on genocide prevention.<br />

Founded in 1994, IAGS meets biennially in a conference format to consider comparative<br />

research, new directions in scholarship, case studies, the links between genocide and massive<br />

human rights violations, and prevention and punishment <strong>of</strong> genocide. Since being<br />

established, conferences have taken place at (or under the auspices <strong>of</strong>) the College <strong>of</strong> William<br />

and Mary (Williamsburg, Virginia), Concordia University (Montreal, Canada), the University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison, the University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota (Minneapolis), the National<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ireland (Galway), Florida Atlantic University (Boca Raton, Florida), and the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sarajevo (Bosnia-Herzegovina). The aim <strong>of</strong> IAGS conferences is to focus more<br />

intensively on questions <strong>of</strong> genocide than is possible in the existing two-hour format <strong>of</strong> most<br />

conferences and to draw colleagues from different disciplines into an interdisciplinary conversation.<br />

In addition to the biennial IAGS conferences, the association has also published<br />

scholarly works under its own imprint. <strong>Genocide</strong> Studies and Prevention: An International Journal<br />

is the <strong>of</strong>ficial organ <strong>of</strong> the IAGS. The association has affiliate relationships with other<br />

like-minded organizations such as the Institute for the Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>Genocide</strong> (New York) and<br />

the Institute on the Holocaust and <strong>Genocide</strong> (Jerusalem, Israel). Membership in the IAGS<br />

is open to scholars, graduate students, and other interested persons worldwide.<br />

International Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights. The International Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights, developed and established<br />

under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, is composed <strong>of</strong> three seminal parts: The<br />

Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights <strong>of</strong> 1948, and two international covenants<br />

adopted by the General Assembly in 1966—one on economic, social, and cultural rights and<br />

the other on civil and political rights (and the means <strong>of</strong> implementation that are part and<br />

parcel <strong>of</strong> the “Optional Protocol” to the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).<br />

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). In<br />

response to a challenge from UN secretary-general K<strong>of</strong>i Annan (b. 1938), Canada’s<br />

prime minister Jean Chrétien (b. 1934) announced the establishment <strong>of</strong> the International<br />

Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty during the United Nations<br />

Millennium Summit in September 2000. The mandate <strong>of</strong> the commission was to encourage<br />

and undertake a comprehensive global debate on the relationship between intervention and<br />

state sovereignty, with an attempt at “reconciling the international community’s responsibility<br />

to act in the face <strong>of</strong> massive violations <strong>of</strong> humanitarian norms while respecting<br />

the sovereign rights <strong>of</strong> states.”<br />

The ICISS was given the mandate to examine, analyze, and debate a wide array <strong>of</strong><br />

questions related to a host <strong>of</strong> legal, moral, political, and operational issues vis-à-vis the<br />

question as to when, if ever, states can legitimately, collectively or individually, carry<br />

out coercive—and, in particular, military—action against another state for the<br />

express purpose <strong>of</strong> protecting people at risk in that state. The latter, then, constitutes<br />

the so-called right <strong>of</strong> humanitarian intervention. An international research team<br />

conducted extensive research in order to collect, examine, and present the latest and<br />

best thinking on the issues <strong>of</strong> intervention and sovereignty and the relationship<br />

between the two. Ultimately, the report’s primary theme became “The Responsibility<br />

to Protect,” the concept that sovereign states have a distinct responsibility to protect<br />

their own citizens from conflicts and violent actions carried out by groups and/or governmental<br />

entities, and if and when sovereign states are either unwilling or unable to<br />

do so, that responsibility must be upheld by the international community or constituent<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!