08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU<br />

28<br />

Upon analysis <strong>of</strong> the data collected by its Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry (COI), the UN declared,<br />

in late January 2005, that it had found ample evidence <strong>of</strong> crimes against humanity but not<br />

genocide (though, it said, the collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> additional evidence could possibly<br />

result in the finding <strong>of</strong> genocide). Subsequently, the UN referred the matter to the<br />

International Criminal Court (ICC), which then began its own investigation with an eye<br />

toward prosecuting the alleged perpetrators.<br />

Two genocide scholars (Dr. Eric Markusen [1946–2007] and Dr. Samuel Totten<br />

[b. 1949–]) served as members <strong>of</strong> the ADP, along with a host <strong>of</strong> lawyers (including a prosecutor<br />

with the U.S. Justice Department), high-ranking police investigators from Canada,<br />

Great Britain , and the United States, and humanitarian specialists. Totten and Markusen<br />

edited a book, <strong>Genocide</strong> in Darfur: Investigating Atrocities in the Sudan (New York: Routledge,<br />

2006), that provides a description, discussion, and analysis <strong>of</strong> the ADP, its findings,<br />

and the ramifications <strong>of</strong> the latter.<br />

Auschwitz-Birkenau. In 1940 SS Chief Heinrich Himmler ordered the establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> what would later become the largest extermination site under Nazi hegemony, thirtyseven<br />

miles west <strong>of</strong> Krakow in southern Poland. Auschwitz I, primarily for Polish political<br />

prisoners, already held almost 11,000 prisoners by 1941 when Auschwitz II, or Birkenau,<br />

was constructed less than two miles away. Birkenau held the primary instruments <strong>of</strong><br />

extermination, the gas chambers, and, ultimately, realized the murders <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

Jews, Poles, Roma, and others, not only due to gassings but also due to so-called medical<br />

experiments, starvation, torture, beatings, and so on. Close to 1.5 million Jews, the primary<br />

victims, including children, met their deaths there, as well as almost 16,000 Soviet<br />

POWs; between 200,000 and 500,000 Roma (definitive figures are difficult to ascertain);<br />

and as many as 2 million others, including Poles, “asocials,” and political dissidents.<br />

Auschwitz III, or Monowitz (Polish Monowice) was used to demarcate a number <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

camps throughout the area; it was mainly a slave-labor operation, which, in 1943,<br />

began producing large quantities <strong>of</strong> synthetic rubber (German Buna) under the auspices<br />

<strong>of</strong> the German industrial conglomerate I. G. Farben, as well as other products. In 1944 an<br />

unsuccessful uprising-rebellion took place which saw both the destruction <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gas chambers and crematoria and the deaths <strong>of</strong> the leaders <strong>of</strong> the rebellion and a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> the other participants. Toward the end <strong>of</strong> that same year, Himmler ordered the dismantling<br />

<strong>of</strong> both Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II. On January 27, 1945, representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

the Soviet army entered Auschwitz and liberated those still alive.<br />

Australia, <strong>Genocide</strong> in. The situation concerning the Aborigines <strong>of</strong> mainland Australia<br />

during the time <strong>of</strong> colonial settlement by Britain poses a number <strong>of</strong> questions relative to<br />

genocide. The most important <strong>of</strong> these is also the most straightforward: did the destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aboriginal society in the century following the arrival <strong>of</strong> the First Fleet in 1788 constitute<br />

genocide? For some, the answer is an unequivocal yes; for others, the answer is<br />

nowhere near as obvious. There was no definite state-initiated plan <strong>of</strong> mass extermination;<br />

indeed, it was frequently the case that colonial governments tried to maintain<br />

Aboriginal security in the face <strong>of</strong> settler and pastoralist encroachments and meted out<br />

punishments (even hangings) <strong>of</strong> those found guilty <strong>of</strong> the murder <strong>of</strong> Aborigines. Despite<br />

this, there were immense and very intensive periods <strong>of</strong> killing in the bush, accompanied<br />

by enormous population losses as a result <strong>of</strong> disease and starvation. The result saw the<br />

effective destruction <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal society by European settlement during the nineteenth<br />

century. Where genocide is concerned, however, this must be understood against two

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!