08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEAGUE OF NATIONS, AND INTERVENTION<br />

256<br />

League <strong>of</strong> Nations, and Intervention. The League <strong>of</strong> Nations was formally established in<br />

1919, a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> World War I (1914–1918) and the failure <strong>of</strong> international<br />

diplomacy to maintain the peace. In its attempts at creating a new order for the world based<br />

on open diplomacy, fairness, and the rule <strong>of</strong> law, the League adopted a procedure based on dialogue,<br />

conferencing, and negotiation rather than multilateral intervention in order to reduce<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> conflict. The principle <strong>of</strong> nonintervention was rooted in a preexisting belief in the<br />

inviolability <strong>of</strong> the state, as guaranteed by the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Westphalia (1648). The League, so<br />

closely bound up in the post–World War I peace settlements, found itself a prisoner <strong>of</strong> the very<br />

structures it was attempting to control—realpolitik, a states system, secret diplomacy, and the<br />

impunity <strong>of</strong> states acting contrary to the common international good. The League was only<br />

ever as powerful as the resolve <strong>of</strong> its member states, and none were at any stage prepared to<br />

surrender any portion <strong>of</strong> their sovereignty in favor <strong>of</strong> an international ideal that had never<br />

before been tried. The key doctrine determining the League’s attitude toward global security<br />

was thus an extension <strong>of</strong> the old idea <strong>of</strong> collective security, only now it was on a much bigger<br />

scale than had ever been the case in the past. In this sense, the League was not as revolutionary<br />

as many initially hoped it would be; but its novelty lay in the fact that it was the first<br />

attempt <strong>of</strong> its kind, and, as such, it did not act as much more than an experimental undertaking<br />

in an untried area <strong>of</strong> international cooperation. Given this, such notions as multilateral<br />

intervention for the purpose <strong>of</strong> peace making, peace enforcement, or peacekeeping were neither<br />

suggested nor tried under the League <strong>of</strong> Nations. It took the failure <strong>of</strong> that body, a second<br />

world war, and a new international organization—the United Nations—to realize the necessity<br />

<strong>of</strong> cutting through the structures that had so impeded the League’s ability to act.<br />

Lebensborn (German, “Fountain <strong>of</strong> Life”). The Nazi program <strong>of</strong> selective breeding <strong>of</strong><br />

its population to produce a superior or “master” race. Without benefit <strong>of</strong> marriage,<br />

German women who met stringent physical standards were urged to produce children<br />

with SS men who met the same standards <strong>of</strong> height, weight, blond hair, blue eyes, and<br />

athleticism. Upon conception, these women were sent to special maternity homes where<br />

they were cared for until the birth <strong>of</strong> their children. The program, however, did not prove<br />

successful, and, in 1942, the term Lebensborn became a code term for the kidnapping <strong>of</strong><br />

Polish and other children who met these idealized characteristics and were placed in German<br />

families. After the war, many <strong>of</strong> the actual records <strong>of</strong> such births and kidnappings<br />

were lost; thus, no actual numbers in either category can be accurately assessed.<br />

Lebensraum (German, “Living Room,” or “Living Space”). A cornerstone <strong>of</strong> Nazi<br />

foreign policy was the belief <strong>of</strong> the inherent “right” <strong>of</strong> the so-called master race to<br />

appropriate whatever lands needed, primarily to the East, for the settlement, survival,<br />

and growth <strong>of</strong> its population. Not only the lands themselves but their populations were<br />

viewed as resources to be exploited. The concept itself preceded the rise <strong>of</strong> Adolf<br />

Hitler (1889–1945) and the Nazis and was already taught in German universities in<br />

the early 1920s, one possible adumbration <strong>of</strong> the political implications <strong>of</strong> social Darwinism.<br />

Hitler himself advocated such in his book Mein Kampf, with his argument <strong>of</strong><br />

Germany’s “moral right” to acquire such lands and resources. Thus, the annexation <strong>of</strong><br />

Austria, the takeover <strong>of</strong> the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, Poland, and parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Soviet Union may all be assessed from this understanding.<br />

Lemkin, Raphael (1900–1959). Polish Jewish refugee, lawyer, and legal scholar, Lemkin<br />

was born in rural village <strong>of</strong> Bezwodene and is best remembered as the individual who coined<br />

the word genocide and who served as the motivating force behind the (1948) United Nations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!