08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HADEMAR<br />

180<br />

Controversy has swirled around the issue as to who was behind the shooting down <strong>of</strong><br />

Habyarimana’s plane. A French investigation team blamed Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front<br />

leader—and later president <strong>of</strong> Rwanda—Paul Kagame. Others, including Kagame,<br />

however, have argued it was Hutu extremists.<br />

Hademar. The name <strong>of</strong> a location in Germany where thousands <strong>of</strong> people with physical<br />

or psychological handicaps, or incurable diseases, were murdered in the Nazi “euthanasia<br />

program” between 1941 and 1945. It is estimated that approximately eleven thousand<br />

victims were killed at Hademar. Part hospital, part sanatorium, the center had originally<br />

been established in 1901 and was extended and refurbished in 1933 as the State<br />

Psychiatric Center. Hademar can be likened to the Austrian Hartheim Castle, the center<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Nazi euthanasia program, in which thirty thousand people were killed. Hademar was<br />

also utilized for the murder <strong>of</strong> others: between 1944 and 1945 it was used in order to kill<br />

slave laborers who were unable to keep working because <strong>of</strong> illness or debility, and at other<br />

times it was used for the purpose <strong>of</strong> murdering Allied nationals. Hademar has become a<br />

byword for bureaucratic murder masked as medical “improvement” in the name <strong>of</strong> perverted<br />

science. Many <strong>of</strong> the doctors involved in the killing at Hademar were transferred to the Nazi<br />

death camps during World War II, the better to practice their lethal skills: these included<br />

Drs. Ernst Baumhardt, Guenther Hennecke, Friedrich Berner, and Hans-Bobo Gorgass.<br />

Hague Conventions. Two conferences relating to issues concerning the conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

nations at war took place at The Hague, Netherlands, in 1899 and 1907. At these<br />

conferences, a basic principle was established formally, namely, that individuals had rights<br />

that should be respected as members <strong>of</strong> the international community. It was recognized at<br />

the 1899 conference that alternatives to war should be sought prior to conflict taking<br />

place, well in advance <strong>of</strong> antagonism developing into war. These alternatives could<br />

include, it was suggested, such devices as disarmament and international arbitration. The<br />

1907 conference addressed issues that dealt with the laws and customs <strong>of</strong> war on land.<br />

Both the 1899 and 1907 conferences had at base a need to try to diminish the evils <strong>of</strong> war<br />

by revising, where possible, its general laws and customs. The 1907 conference established<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> prohibitions over the behavior <strong>of</strong> nations engaged in war, with the broad<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> making warfare more humane and respecting the rights <strong>of</strong> individuals. These<br />

included, inter alia, prohibitions on attacking undefended towns or villages, using poison<br />

or other weapons that cause “superfluous” injuries, willfully destroying religious or cultural<br />

institutions, mistreating civilians in occupied territory, using poison gas in warfare, and<br />

violating a nation’s neutrality. The 1899 and 1907 Hague Conventions were signed by<br />

twenty-six countries, each <strong>of</strong> which effectively agreed to restrain its behavior in wartime<br />

by enshrining a set <strong>of</strong> actions that were henceforth to be classed as war crimes. The<br />

signatories refrained from embracing the notion <strong>of</strong> an international court, however,<br />

preferring to retreat behind well-established principles relating to the absolute sovereignty<br />

<strong>of</strong> nations. A criticism <strong>of</strong> the Hague Conventions is that nothing was established in the<br />

way <strong>of</strong> an enforcement mechanism for states contravening the laws proscribed by the<br />

treaties. The Hague Conventions codified the actions that could be considered war<br />

crimes, and although they failed to prevent the outbreak <strong>of</strong> war in 1914, they retained<br />

their attraction as an ideal to which states should aspire and were invoked in discussions<br />

throughout World War I and its aftermath.<br />

Hama. A city in central Syria, the location <strong>of</strong> a genocidal massacre in February 1982.<br />

Hama, a city entrenched as a bastion <strong>of</strong> traditional, landed power and Sunni Muslim

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!