08.06.2013 Views

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

Dictionary of Genocide - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fundamentalism, was a long-term opponent <strong>of</strong> Syria’s secular Baathist state. At the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> 1982, it had an estimated population <strong>of</strong> about three hundred thousand people.<br />

At the time, relations between the city and the government <strong>of</strong> President Hafiz al-Asad<br />

(1930–2000) were poor. The religious opponents <strong>of</strong> Asad, the Muslim Brotherhood,<br />

directed by charismatic leader Abu Bakr, found themselves besieged by government forces<br />

in Hama in February 1982. Bakr gave the order for his forces to break out <strong>of</strong> the city, thus<br />

giving way to a general uprising and jihad (holy war) against Asad’s rule. Muslim<br />

Brotherhood forces held the city for about ten days, during which time they killed the<br />

governor and several hundred other city <strong>of</strong>ficials. Twelve thousand government troops<br />

assaulted Brethren strongholds with artillery and tanks; helicopters attacked the city, conducting<br />

sweeps and placing soldiers in strategic areas. Hama was shelled for three consecutive<br />

weeks, destroying much <strong>of</strong> the city. Upon their entry into what was left <strong>of</strong> the city,<br />

government troops then engaged in an orgy <strong>of</strong> pillage. Up to thirty thousand townsfolk,<br />

representing one-tenth <strong>of</strong> the population, were killed in the campaign. The central issues<br />

were tw<strong>of</strong>old: first, to strengthen Asad’s rule in a region known for its opposition; and second,<br />

to remove the Sunni fundamentalist influence over Syrian life. The government saw<br />

that Hama would have to be a last-ditch battle for the future <strong>of</strong> the country, in which only<br />

one side could win. Moreover, as the major supporters <strong>of</strong> the government were from the<br />

minority Alawite sect (a breakaway sect from Shiism, known for their own rigidly<br />

doctrinaire approach to Islam), the struggle also assumed the form <strong>of</strong> an internal religious<br />

faction fight for dominance. Given this, it could be said that a case <strong>of</strong> genocide could be<br />

made, under the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment <strong>of</strong> the Crime<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Genocide</strong>, for what transpired in Hama on the grounds <strong>of</strong> Asad’s determination to<br />

destroy Hama’s population for religious reasons, though it was as much a political struggle,<br />

or even a rivalry between urban and rural lifestyles, that got out <strong>of</strong> hand. Hama<br />

became a symbol throughout the Middle East for brutal repression by the modern state,<br />

and, in serving as an object lesson, it coerced the Muslim Brotherhood and gave the<br />

secular state a new lease on life in Syria.<br />

Hamidian Massacres. A series <strong>of</strong> major massacres committed by the Ottoman government<br />

under the direction <strong>of</strong> Sultan Abdul Hamid II (1842–1918; reigned 1876–1909)<br />

against the Armenian community <strong>of</strong> the Ottoman Empire between 1894 and 1896. The<br />

massacres were perpetrated in mid-1894 in the region <strong>of</strong> Sasun, in southern Armenia;<br />

they spread throughout 1895 and showed that the Sultan’s government had intensified<br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> anti-Armenian persecution in a dramatic way. The main explanation for the<br />

massacres lay in the Sultan’s desire to staunch the growth <strong>of</strong> Armenian nationalism and<br />

any calls for reform that could give the Armenians a greater say in imperial affairs. The<br />

massacres were thus genocidal in effect (particularly in certain regions <strong>of</strong> Armenia), but<br />

were not genocidal in intent—the preference being to intimidate and terrorize the<br />

Armenian population rather than destroy it. Estimates <strong>of</strong> those killed range widely, from<br />

anywhere between one hundred thousand and three hundred thousand, with tens <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands more maimed or homeless. Most <strong>of</strong> those killed were men; the killings took<br />

place in open areas, in full sight <strong>of</strong> the community. Vast numbers <strong>of</strong> Armenians fled the<br />

country, and thousands <strong>of</strong> others were forcibly converted to Islam. In view <strong>of</strong> the ferocity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the massacres, Abdul Hamid II was nicknamed the “Red Sultan,” or “Bloody Abdul,”<br />

and the massacres were named for him as a way <strong>of</strong> distinguishing these actions from the<br />

later (and much more extensive) genocide <strong>of</strong> 1915–1923.<br />

HAMIDIAN MASSACRES<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!