the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 THE COEPUS, EPINAL, ERFURT AND LEYDEN GLOSSARIES<br />
(M 39) Mango: mengio (Phoc. 413, 23); (M 44) Matrix: quid:am<br />
(Phoc. 421, 8); (M 46) Magalia: byre (or else Mapalia (: casae<br />
pastorum, Magalia): byre) (Phoc. 428, 12-13); (M 47) Magis-<br />
tratus, senatus (Phoc, 420, 1); (M 48) Mango: negotiator (Phoc.<br />
413, 23); (M 49) Mars, Martis : Tiig (Phoc. 411, 33); (M 50)<br />
Mas, maris, a marito dictum (Phoc. 411, 33); (M 81) Magalia:<br />
byre. The last item we may suppose to have stood in <strong>the</strong><br />
'<br />
bottom-margin of <strong>the</strong> exemplar, whe<strong>the</strong>r as a correction or as<br />
a supplement of M 46, <strong>and</strong> to have been transcribed by <strong>the</strong><br />
copyist where it stood. In <strong>the</strong> ME-chapter: (M 161) Merx :<br />
mertze (Phoc. 412, 2); (M 163) Meio, minxi, a mingendo dictum<br />
(Phoc. 434, 13); (M 164) Merx, mercis, a merc<strong>and</strong>o, non merces,<br />
mercedis (Phoc. 412, 2).<br />
The omission of Mergus: scalfr may<br />
be a mere accident of transcription due to <strong>the</strong> similarity of a<br />
neighbour (M 160 = Ep. 15 A 24) Mergulus: scalfur. In <strong>the</strong><br />
MU-chapter :<br />
332) Mugil :<br />
(M haeced (Phoc. 414, 20); (M 338)<br />
Mulio: horsctegn (Phoc. 413, 8); (M 339) Mugil: heardhara<br />
(Phoc. 414, 20); (M 340) Muria: faex olei (Phoc. 427, 21):<br />
(M 342) Murex, muricis, a lapide (Phoc. 420, 30); (M 343) Mus,<br />
muris: muus (Phoc. 411, 33). Here too <strong>the</strong> position of <strong>the</strong> first<br />
Mugil item may be <strong>the</strong> result of its having been a correction (or<br />
supplement) entered in <strong>the</strong> margin (in this case <strong>the</strong> top-margin)<br />
of <strong>the</strong> page. The contiguity of two separate items, Mugil: heard-<br />
hara, Mugil: haeced, would account for <strong>the</strong> confusion. So <strong>the</strong>re<br />
is not so much irregularity after all. We see <strong>the</strong> EE-arrange-<br />
ment reflected in Corpus, but <strong>the</strong> glass is dull <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> image<br />
blurred. Inference from <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>the</strong> Epinal manuscript's<br />
items is fairly safe ; but from <strong>the</strong> order in <strong>the</strong> Corpus College<br />
MS., dangerous.<br />
A mishap has befallen <strong>the</strong> Phocas-batch in <strong>the</strong> A-chapter.<br />
The batch begins at Ep. 3 E 11 (=C. G. L. v 343, 14) with <strong>the</strong><br />
item Accio (Phoc. 435, 6), an item followed by As (Phoc. 411, 33),<br />
Arx (Phoc. 412, 1). The rest of <strong>the</strong> batch has become separated.<br />
We do not find it till Ep. 5 C 18 (= C. G. L. v 346, 43), viz. Aes<br />
(Phoc. 412, 8), Astus (Phoc. 420, 6), Ador (Phoc. 416, 9), Antes<br />
(Phoc. 428, 6). The separation is made by <strong>the</strong> intervention of<br />
that portion of <strong>the</strong> EE Glossary (in this chapter) which is ar-<br />
ranged according to <strong>the</strong> first two letters (not <strong>the</strong> first letter