19.06.2013 Views

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 THE COEPUS, EPINAL, ERFURT AND LEYDEN GLOSSARIES<br />

(M 39) Mango: mengio (Phoc. 413, 23); (M 44) Matrix: quid:am<br />

(Phoc. 421, 8); (M 46) Magalia: byre (or else Mapalia (: casae<br />

pastorum, Magalia): byre) (Phoc. 428, 12-13); (M 47) Magis-<br />

tratus, senatus (Phoc, 420, 1); (M 48) Mango: negotiator (Phoc.<br />

413, 23); (M 49) Mars, Martis : Tiig (Phoc. 411, 33); (M 50)<br />

Mas, maris, a marito dictum (Phoc. 411, 33); (M 81) Magalia:<br />

byre. The last item we may suppose to have stood in <strong>the</strong><br />

'<br />

bottom-margin of <strong>the</strong> exemplar, whe<strong>the</strong>r as a correction or as<br />

a supplement of M 46, <strong>and</strong> to have been transcribed by <strong>the</strong><br />

copyist where it stood. In <strong>the</strong> ME-chapter: (M 161) Merx :<br />

mertze (Phoc. 412, 2); (M 163) Meio, minxi, a mingendo dictum<br />

(Phoc. 434, 13); (M 164) Merx, mercis, a merc<strong>and</strong>o, non merces,<br />

mercedis (Phoc. 412, 2).<br />

The omission of Mergus: scalfr may<br />

be a mere accident of transcription due to <strong>the</strong> similarity of a<br />

neighbour (M 160 = Ep. 15 A 24) Mergulus: scalfur. In <strong>the</strong><br />

MU-chapter :<br />

332) Mugil :<br />

(M haeced (Phoc. 414, 20); (M 338)<br />

Mulio: horsctegn (Phoc. 413, 8); (M 339) Mugil: heardhara<br />

(Phoc. 414, 20); (M 340) Muria: faex olei (Phoc. 427, 21):<br />

(M 342) Murex, muricis, a lapide (Phoc. 420, 30); (M 343) Mus,<br />

muris: muus (Phoc. 411, 33). Here too <strong>the</strong> position of <strong>the</strong> first<br />

Mugil item may be <strong>the</strong> result of its having been a correction (or<br />

supplement) entered in <strong>the</strong> margin (in this case <strong>the</strong> top-margin)<br />

of <strong>the</strong> page. The contiguity of two separate items, Mugil: heard-<br />

hara, Mugil: haeced, would account for <strong>the</strong> confusion. So <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is not so much irregularity after all. We see <strong>the</strong> EE-arrange-<br />

ment reflected in Corpus, but <strong>the</strong> glass is dull <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> image<br />

blurred. Inference from <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>the</strong> Epinal manuscript's<br />

items is fairly safe ; but from <strong>the</strong> order in <strong>the</strong> Corpus College<br />

MS., dangerous.<br />

A mishap has befallen <strong>the</strong> Phocas-batch in <strong>the</strong> A-chapter.<br />

The batch begins at Ep. 3 E 11 (=C. G. L. v 343, 14) with <strong>the</strong><br />

item Accio (Phoc. 435, 6), an item followed by As (Phoc. 411, 33),<br />

Arx (Phoc. 412, 1). The rest of <strong>the</strong> batch has become separated.<br />

We do not find it till Ep. 5 C 18 (= C. G. L. v 346, 43), viz. Aes<br />

(Phoc. 412, 8), Astus (Phoc. 420, 6), Ador (Phoc. 416, 9), Antes<br />

(Phoc. 428, 6). The separation is made by <strong>the</strong> intervention of<br />

that portion of <strong>the</strong> EE Glossary (in this chapter) which is ar-<br />

ranged according to <strong>the</strong> first two letters (not <strong>the</strong> first letter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!