19.06.2013 Views

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 THE CORPUS, EPINAL, ERFURT AND LEYDEN GLOSSARIES<br />

attempt<br />

to transcribe in Latin <strong>the</strong> unfamiliar letters of a Greek<br />

word, we must not infer a separate MS. for each freakish meta<br />

morphosis. But, as was said of <strong>the</strong> Orosius glosses, <strong>the</strong> question<br />

how far <strong>the</strong> material was heterogeneous is of little account, since<br />

it is clear that <strong>the</strong> same material was used by all compilers, hj<br />

<strong>the</strong> compiler of Leid. (in this case) as well as by <strong>the</strong> compilers o:<br />

EE <strong>and</strong> Corpus. Section 30 of <strong>the</strong> Leyden Glossary, assigned t'<br />

this collection, has nearly one hundred items,<br />

all of <strong>the</strong>m Greel<br />

words <strong>and</strong> nearly all appearing in EE <strong>and</strong> Corpus. As specimen<br />

of a Jerome batch in EE take <strong>the</strong> opening of <strong>the</strong> P-section<br />

(Ep. 17 E 15-26 = C. G. L. v 36-47) Peri philoptochias (Jer. 111.<br />

ch. 117), Ptochias (ibid.), Prosomilian (ch. 61), Pseudoepigrapha<br />

(ch. 32), Peri tes zoes <strong>the</strong>oretices (ch. 11), Periodus (ch. 7),<br />

Hypo<strong>the</strong>seon (ch. 86), Peri tes cratorias tu <strong>the</strong>u (ch. 13), Pro-<br />

sephonesen (ch. 38), Prosomilian (ch. 61), Periodus (ch. 7), Peri<br />

autocratoros empirias (ch. 13). What folly to transfer such things<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir proper place in a Jerome MS. to <strong>the</strong> pages of a dic-<br />

The excerptor's troubles are revealed by such ludicrous<br />

tionary !<br />

errors as that in <strong>the</strong> first item of ano<strong>the</strong>r Jerome batch in <strong>the</strong><br />

same section of EE (Ep. 18 C 25 - C. G. L. v 379, 14 = Corp. P 837)<br />

Pseudepigrapha : incerta et de octava egregium.<br />

The lemma-word<br />

comes from Jer. 111. 32 (sed ab eruditis quasi '\lrev8e'iTijpa(j)a<br />

repudiantur), but <strong>the</strong> last four words of <strong>the</strong> interpretation<br />

marginal supplement to supply <strong>the</strong>ir omission in ch. 35 (scripsit.<br />

are a<br />

et De Octava egregium avvray/jua).<br />

The Bible (i.e. Vulgate) glosses of EE <strong>and</strong> Corpus have a<br />

far wider range than those of <strong>the</strong> Leyden MS. In it <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

none from Genesis to Second Kings (4 Reg.) nor from <strong>the</strong> Acts<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Revelation; for <strong>the</strong> jewel-name glosses from Rev. xxi<br />

9-10, common to Leid., EE <strong>and</strong> Corpus, do not belong to <strong>the</strong><br />

Bible group. And its Bible items, extending from § 7 to § 25<br />

(roughly speaking, one section for each book), are not nearly so<br />

closely connected with those of EE <strong>and</strong> Corpus<br />

. .<br />

as <strong>the</strong> Jerome<br />

glosses just mentioned. Still <strong>the</strong> connexion is patent, especially<br />

in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> Leyden collection. The item Alabastrum<br />

(from Matth. xxvi 7) reads thus in Leid. (§ 24, 13) Alabastrum:<br />

proprium nomen lapidis et vas sic nominatur de illo lapide<br />

factum. In Corpus (A 442) we have precisely <strong>the</strong> same inter-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!