the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
the corpus, épinal, erfurt and leyden glossaries, viii - World eBook ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
80 THE CORPUS, EPINAL, ERFURT AND LEYDEN GLOSSARIES<br />
see Classical Philology, xiii 9); <strong>and</strong> though we may make a;<br />
rough-<strong>and</strong>-ready rule that <strong>the</strong> first portions of EE are <strong>the</strong> place-<br />
for Hermeneumata items, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> second portions of Erf.^ for;<br />
Philoxenus items, we cannot feel complete confidence. A useful]<br />
clue is <strong>the</strong> presence of <strong>the</strong> word Graece, although this adverbappears<br />
often in items of o<strong>the</strong>r provenance too: e.g. in <strong>the</strong><br />
Abstrusa item C. G. L. iv 41, 18 Coluber: serpens, ophis Graece.<br />
Even a Greek word begins such an Abstrusa item as (iv 112, 39)<br />
Malacia: mollities; Graecum est. We must remember that only<br />
a very brief selection out of <strong>the</strong> huge original Philoxenus Glossary<br />
was probably used by our compiler. It is not impossible that his.<br />
'glossae verborum' <strong>and</strong> 'glossae<br />
nominum' were constructed from<br />
Philoxenus materials, for it is at <strong>the</strong> ends of <strong>the</strong> sections, <strong>the</strong><br />
places appropriate to <strong>the</strong> 'glossae verborum' <strong>and</strong> 'glossae nominum'<br />
(with occasional Anglosaxon interpretations) that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
Philoxenus items seem to shew <strong>the</strong>mselves most clearly. But<br />
<strong>the</strong> 'second glossary' too seems to have had a Philoxenus thread<br />
(cf <strong>the</strong> Philox. miswriting A[u]xillae in EE ii, Ep. 5 C 16, C.G.L.<br />
V 346,41). It would not be difficult to exhibit Philoxenus clusters<br />
of Erf^; but, since <strong>the</strong> identification of all-Latin items with bi-<br />
lingual items can seldom be quite convincing,<br />
refrain.<br />
it seems better to-<br />
Here we may turn (in fulfilment of <strong>the</strong> promise of this,<br />
article's title) to consider <strong>the</strong> Third Erfurt Glossary (a frag-<br />
ment, A-L),<br />
<strong>the</strong> '<br />
Glossae Nominum' (cf Class. Quart, xi 194 sq.).<br />
The digression must be brief, for this glossary is not closely<br />
connected with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> has been already edited by Loewe i<br />
(Leipzig, 1884), so far as an edition was possible<br />
in his time,<br />
Loewe has shewn that it follows an AB-order <strong>and</strong> that each<br />
section exhibits in regular sequence batches of nouns of <strong>the</strong>-<br />
same termination (first, nouns ending in -a; <strong>the</strong>n, nouns endingin<br />
-us; next, nouns ending in -iwi, <strong>and</strong> so on). And he has, we<br />
may say, proved that its items come (ultimately) from <strong>the</strong> (full,,<br />
original) Philoxenus Glossary, <strong>the</strong> Greek interpretations being<br />
rendered (often absurdly' misrendered) in Latin, occasionally in<br />
1 Thus <strong>the</strong> Philoxenus item (C. G. L. ii 14, 26) Albunea : AevKodia (pre-<br />
sumably a Virgil or Horace gloss) appears as (C. G. L. v 590, 44)<br />
visio !<br />
Albunea: alba,