6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Marthie Grobler et al. Giles, J. (2010). How will the PPI Bill affect you? Available from: http://www.michalsonsattorneys.com/ how-willthe-ppi-bill-affect-you/2586?gclid=COXtlKz6yKQCFcbD7QodHzHJDg (Accessed 10 October 2010). Government Gazette. (2003). Vol. 451 Cape Town 15 January 2003 No. 24250. No. 54 of 2002: Promotion of Access to Information Amendment Act, 2002. International Standards Organization. (2008). ISO/IEC 27005: 2005. Information security risk management. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=50297 (Accessed 10 October 2010). Kelsey, JTG. (2008). Hacking into International Humanitarian Law: The Principles of Distinction and Neutrality in the Age of Cyber Warfare. P1427. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Landing Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/mlr106&div=64&id=&page= (Accessed 22 September 2010). Krepinevich, AF. (2003). Keeping pace with the military-technological revolution. Available from: http://www.issues.org/19.4/updated/krepinevich.pdf (Accessed 22 September 2010). Kulesza, J. (2010). State responsibility for acts of cyber-terrorism. 5 th GigaNet symposium Vilnius, Lithuania. Markoff, J. (2010). Step Taken to End Impasse Over Cybersecurity Talks. Available from: http://www. nytimes.com/2010/07/17/world/17cyber.html?_r=1 (Accessed 8 October 2010). NATO. (ND). Defending against cyber attacks. Available from: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/ topics_49193.htm (Accessed 22 September 2010). O'Hanlon, ME. (2000). Technological change and the future of warfare. Brookings Institution Press: Washington. Owen, RS. (2008). Infrastructures of Cyber Warfare. Chapter V. In: Janczewski, L. & Colarik, AM. Cyber warfare and cyber terrorism. Information Science Reference: London. PAIA Act (Promotion of Access to Information Act No 2 of 2000 as amended). (2000). Available from: http://www.dfa.gov.za/department/accessinfo_act.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2010). Republic of South Africa. (2010). Protection of Personal Information Bill. Available from: http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/bills/B9-2009_ProtectionOfPersonalInformation.pdf (Accessed 10 October 2010). RIC Act (Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-related information Act. (2002). Available from: http://www.acts.co.za/ric_act/whnjs.htm. (Accessed 10 October 2010). SA Constitution. (1996). Available from: http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/index.htm (Accessed 10 October 2010). Tiirmaa-Klaar, H. (2010). International Cooperation in Cyber Security: Actors, Levels and Challenges. Cyber security 2010, Brussels, 22 September 2010 (<strong>Conference</strong>). UN Information Officer. (2010). Delegates Consider Best Response to Cybercrime as Congress Committee - Takes Up Dark Side of Advances in Information Technology. Available from: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2010/soccp349.doc.htm (Accessed 10 October 2010). Warren, MJ. (2008). Terrorism and the internet. Chapter VI. In: Janczewski, L. & Colarik, AM. Cyber warfare and cyber terrorism. Information Science Reference: London. Williams, G. & Arreymbi, J. (2007). Is cyber tribalism winning online information warfare? ISSE/ SECURE 2007 Securing Electronic Business Processes (2007): 65-72, January 01, 2007. Wilson, C. (2007). Information Operations, Electronic Warfare and Cyberwar: Capabilities and related policy issues. CRS report for congress. Available from: www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/ RL31787.pdf (Accessed 17 September 2010). 98
Cyber Strategy and the Law of Armed Conflict Ulf Haeussler National Defense University, Washington, USA ulf.haeussler@ndu.edu Abstract: At the time of writing, the author was Assistant Legal Advisor Operational Law, Headquarters, Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (NATO HQ SACT). The views expressed herein are the author's own and to not necessarily reflect the official position or policy of NATO and/or HQ SACT. Abstract: At its Lisbon Summit (November 2010), NATO has adopted its Strategic Concept. The U.S. may soon adopt its Cyberstrategy 3.0 (originally expected for December 2010). Both strategy documents will contribute to a growing policy consensus regarding cyber security and defence as well as provide better policy insights regarding cyber offence. In doing so, they will contribute to a better understanding of how NATO and the U.S. want to prepare for, and conduct cyber warfare in a manner congruent with the law of armed conflict. In addition, they will determine to what extent this branch of the law needs to be better understood, developed, or reformed. Accordingly, this paper indicates how the existing legal and policy frameworks intersect with practical aspects of cyber warfare and associated intelligence activities, analyses how the new strategy documents develop and change the existing policy framework, and what repercussions this may have for the interpretation and application of the law of armed conflict. It also demonstrates how the new strategy documents inform the policy and legal discourse and hence help confirm that NATO and U.S. as well as other NATO Nations' cyber activities are, and will continue to be, lawful and legitimate. Keywords: NATO Strategic Concept 2010, U.S. Cyberstrategy 3.0, Law of Armed Conflict, collective security, collective defence 1. Introduction Cyberspace is increasingly referred to as one of the global commons and as the fifth domain in which warfare may occur (Lynn 2010, 101). Activities in cyberspace as well as involving the use of cyber capabilities to create, or contribute to the creation of, effects in any one of the other commons, or domains, have attracted significant discussion and analysis among technical experts, policymakers, and legal scholars. The ensuing efforts to develop frameworks for cyberspace and the use of associated capabilities (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'cyberspace') bring various perspectives to bear. Cyberspace is multifunctional; it equally attracts private activities (with a strong business component) and governments' official conduct as well as associated competing, if not conflicting, interests. Not surprisingly, cyberspace has its unarguable dark side – on both its non-governmental and its governmental end. The range of challenges and threats associated with the dark side of cyberspace comprises, but is not limited to, privacy intrusions, financial loss, damage and destruction in the physical domains, the potential of injury or even death, and (other) adverse effects on the effectiveness of government. These challenges and threats reflects the large extent to which computers and other information and communication technology devices can be leveraged as weapons by non-governmental actors. Further challenges may arise out of policy positions adopted by some non-governmental actors. For instance, the so-called 'internet pirates' endorse the notion of a cyberspace beyond any government control whatsoever – a desire which, were it to come true, might exacerbate all other challenges and threats referred to above. Attempts to characterise cyber challenges and threats have usually used references to challenges and threats in the physical domains, to which the word 'cyber' is added as a qualifier, enabling the creation of catchwords such as cyber crime, cyber terrorism, and cyber attack. The terminology developed using this method is attractive because it triggers analogies with known phenomena. However, it is also prone to carrying misleading connotations since such analogies may easily fuel misconceptions. For instance, the terms 'cyber crime' and 'cyber terrorism' do not capture the whole range of non-governmental actors' malicious activities; moreover, they do not even attempt to address possible links between non-governmental actors and their potential governmental sponsors. By contrast, the term 'cyber attack' is too broad. Thus, information gathering activities may be referred to as cyber attacks, though they might not necessarily or directly cause tangible damage. The undifferentiated use of the notion of 'attack' may foster arguments by which a nation's inherent right of self-defence is considered relevant to cyber activities or actions which neither has nor causes potential or actual adverse effects. These examples may be indicative of a gap between technological realities and the terminology used in policymaking as well as legal interpretation. 99
Page 1 and 2:
The Proceedings of the 6th Internat
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Paper Title Author(s) Page
Page 5 and 6:
Preface These Proceedings are the w
Page 7 and 8:
Biographies of contributing authors
Page 9 and 10:
Department of Computer Science, IQR
Page 11 and 12:
Using the Longest Common Substring
Page 13 and 14:
Jaime Acosta Some techniques that u
Page 15 and 16:
Jaime Acosta assigned by an anti-vi
Page 17 and 18:
Jaime Acosta Cormen, T.H., Leiserso
Page 19 and 20:
Hind Al Falasi and Liren Zhang tran
Page 21 and 22:
Hind Al Falasi and Liren Zhang ther
Page 23 and 24:
Hind Al Falasi and Liren Zhang the
Page 25 and 26:
Edwin Leigh Armistead and Thomas Mu
Page 27 and 28:
Deception Operations Security (OPS
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
The Uses and Limits of Game Theory
Page 35 and 36:
3. Limits to using game theory 3.1
Page 37 and 38:
Merritt Baer Effective cyberintrusi
Page 39 and 40:
Merritt Baer 1.5), there seems to b
Page 41 and 42:
Merritt Baer Report of the Defense
Page 43 and 44:
Ivan Burke and Renier van Heerden F
Page 45 and 46:
Ivan Burke and Renier van Heerden a
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Marco Carvalho et al. systems start
Page 55 and 56:
Marco Carvalho et al. Benatallah, 2
Page 57 and 58: Marco Carvalho et al. management la
Page 59 and 60: Marco Carvalho et al. Figure 4: Sta
Page 61 and 62: Marco Carvalho et al. Sorrels, D.,
Page 63 and 64: Manoj Cherukuri and Srinivas Mukkam
Page 79 and 80: Mecealus Cronkrite et al. to see bo
Page 81 and 82: Mecealus Cronkrite et al. trivial.
Page 83 and 84: Mecealus Cronkrite et al. socially
Page 85 and 86: Mecealus Cronkrite et al. The views
Page 87 and 88: Vincent Garramone and Daniel Likari
Page 95 and 96: Stephen Groat et al. Sections 4 and
Page 97 and 98: Stephen Groat et al. probability fo
Page 99 and 100: Stephen Groat et al. host. In this
Page 101 and 102: Stephen Groat et al. changing addre
Page 103 and 104: Marthie Grobler et al. leadership,
Page 105 and 106: Marthie Grobler et al. apply to sta
Page 107: Marthie Grobler et al. 6. Working t
Page 111 and 112: Ulf Haeussler Alliance and Allies r
Page 113 and 114: Ulf Haeussler following the invocat
Page 115 and 116: Ulf Haeussler NCSA (2009) NCSA Supp
Page 117 and 118: Karim Hamza and Van Dalen of respon
Page 119 and 120: Karim Hamza and Van Dalen From a mi
Page 121 and 122: Karim Hamza and Van Dalen productiv
Page 123 and 124: Intelligence-Driven Computer Networ
Page 125 and 126: Eric Hutchins et al. of defensive a
Page 127 and 128: Eric Hutchins et al. Defenders can
Page 129 and 130: Eric Hutchins et al. Equally as imp
Page 131 and 132: Eric Hutchins et al. X-Mailer: Yaho
Page 133 and 134: Eric Hutchins et al. Received: (qma
Page 135 and 136: Eric Hutchins et al. U.S.-China Eco
Page 137 and 138: Saara Jantunen and Aki-Mauri Huhtin
Page 145 and 146: Brian Jewell and Justin Beaver In t
Page 147 and 148: Brian Jewell and Justin Beaver Figu
Page 149 and 150: 4. Evaluation Brian Jewell and Just
Page 151 and 152: Brian Jewell and Justin Beaver othe
Page 153 and 154: Detection of YASS Using Calibration
Page 155 and 156: Kesav Kancherla and Srinivas Mukkam
Page 157 and 158: M M M Su−2 Sv ∑∑ u= 1 v= 1 h(
Page 159 and 160:
5.2 ROC curves Kesav Kancherla and
Page 161 and 162:
Developing a Knowledge System for I
Page 163 and 164:
Louise Leenen et al. We distinction
Page 165 and 166:
Louise Leenen et al. There is growi
Page 167 and 168:
3.1 Needs analysis Louise Leenen et
Page 169 and 170:
Louise Leenen et al. Kroenke, D.M.
Page 171 and 172:
Jose Mas y Rubi et al. As we can se
Page 173 and 174:
Figure 2: CALEA forensic model (Pel
Page 175 and 176:
Jose Mas y Rubi et al. Table 2: Com
Page 177 and 178:
Jose Mas y Rubi et al. Another pend
Page 179 and 180:
Tree of Objectives Acknowledgements
Page 181 and 182:
Secure Proactive Recovery - a Hardw
Page 183 and 184:
Ruchika Mehresh et al. implementing
Page 185 and 186:
Ruchika Mehresh et al. The coordina
Page 187 and 188:
Ruchika Mehresh et al. multiplicati
Page 189 and 190:
Ruchika Mehresh et al. Table 2: App
Page 191 and 192:
2. Network infiltration detection D
Page 193 and 194:
David Merritt and Barry Mullins on
Page 195 and 196:
David Merritt and Barry Mullins Ess
Page 197 and 198:
David Merritt and Barry Mullins Dev
Page 199 and 200:
Muhammad Naveed Pakistan Computer E
Page 201 and 202:
Muhammad Naveed response could also
Page 203 and 204:
Muhammad Naveed Table 10: Aggressiv
Page 205 and 206:
Muhammad Naveed 2006 Tcp Open Mysql
Page 207 and 208:
Muhammad Naveed 8009 Tcp Open Ajp13
Page 209 and 210:
Muhammad Naveed Austalian Taxation
Page 211 and 212:
Alexandru Nitu world and bring it i
Page 213 and 214:
Alexandru Nitu Article 51 restricts
Page 215 and 216:
Alexandru Nitu As IW strategy and t
Page 217 and 218:
Cyberwarfare and Anonymity Christop
Page 219 and 220:
Christopher Perr attacks again help
Page 221 and 222:
Christopher Perr about the current
Page 223 and 224:
Catch me if you can: Cyber Anonymit
Page 225 and 226:
David Rohret and Michael Kraft reve
Page 227 and 228:
David Rohret and Michael Kraft sary
Page 229 and 230:
Data (Evidence) Removal Shield Davi
Page 231 and 232:
Neutrality in the Context of Cyberw
Page 233 and 234:
Julie Ryan and Daniel Ryan 18th cen
Page 235 and 236:
Julie Ryan and Daniel Ryan “Decla
Page 237 and 238:
Julie Ryan and Daniel Ryan von Glah
Page 239 and 240:
Harm Schotanus et al. In the remain
Page 241 and 242:
Harm Schotanus et al. 2.3.1 Secure
Page 243 and 244:
Harm Schotanus et al. In this setup
Page 245 and 246:
Harm Schotanus et al. the label (by
Page 247 and 248:
Harm Schotanus et al. these aspects
Page 249 and 250:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. they
Page 251 and 252:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. User
Page 253 and 254:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. SPIKE
Page 255 and 256:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. A cl
Page 257 and 258:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. in co
Page 259 and 260:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. In th
Page 261 and 262:
Maria Semmelrock-Picej et al. Fuchs
Page 263 and 264:
Madhu Shankarapani and Srinivas Muk
Page 265 and 266:
Figure 1: UPX packed Trojan Figure
Page 267 and 268:
Trojan.Zb ot- 1342.mal Trojan.Sp y.
Page 269 and 270:
Madhu Shankarapani and Srinivas Muk
Page 271 and 272:
Namosha Veerasamy and Marthie Grobl
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
4. Conclusion Namosha Veerasamy and
Page 279 and 280:
Tanya Zlateva et al. Computer Infor
Page 281 and 282:
Tanya Zlateva et al. security and v
Page 283 and 284:
Tanya Zlateva et al. court opinions
Page 285 and 286:
Tanya Zlateva et al. 5. Pedagogy, e
Page 287 and 288:
PhD Research Papers 277
Page 289 and 290:
Shada Alsalamah et al. Level 3 all
Page 291 and 292:
Shada Alsalamah et al. assure the a
Page 293 and 294:
Shada Alsalamah et al. for Health I
Page 295 and 296:
3. Hematology Laboratory System Who
Page 297 and 298:
Shada Alsalamah et al. Pirnejad, H.
Page 299 and 300:
Michael Bilzor a diverse base of U.
Page 301 and 302:
Michael Bilzor In our current exper
Page 303 and 304:
5. Execution monitor theory Michael
Page 305 and 306:
Michael Bilzor design was run in si
Page 307 and 308:
Michael Bilzor over testbench metho
Page 309 and 310:
Evan Dembskey and Elmarie Biermann
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Theoretical Offensive Cyber Militia
Page 319 and 320:
Rain Ottis Last, but not least, it
Page 321 and 322:
Rain Ottis an infantry battalion, w
Page 323 and 324:
Rain Ottis Ottis, R. (2008) “Anal
Page 325 and 326:
Work in Progress Papers 315
Page 327 and 328:
Large-Scale Analysis of Continuous
Page 329 and 330:
References William Acosta Abadi, D.
Page 331 and 332:
Natarajan Vijayarangan top box unit
Page 333 and 334:
Natarajan Vijayarangan The proposed
show all

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?