27.06.2013 Views

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

6th European Conference - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shada Alsalamah et al.<br />

control over shared patient medical information in the future. This would be hard to achieve without<br />

the identification of the IS issues and emerging needs in this dynamic environment through the study<br />

of a real-life scenario.<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

There is a shift today towards collaboration among different healthcare organisations for a common<br />

goal of better patient treatment through moving to a patient centric control. In achieving this, an IS is<br />

essential to the effectiveness, dynamism, and potential of collaborative working if the full potential is<br />

to be realised. The provision of an SCE for multiple organisations has proved to be a challenge. This<br />

paper presents the results of a study into the inter-professional communication needs of a secure<br />

cross organisation’s information-sharing system in the healthcare domain. The findings in this paper<br />

provide the initial results from the first stage of the project and they will be used to inform further<br />

investigation in the ensuing stages to identify the key IS issues affecting inter-professional<br />

communication, as well as the IS needs in this environment which facilitate the sharing of information<br />

throughout the distributed domain.<br />

7. Appendix A<br />

The following table contains redundancy due to the information type appearing in more than one<br />

record type. This is indicated by [-] with numbers inside were the number refers to the other HIS<br />

record type containing this information. This redundancy has two causes, either the information is<br />

copied from another record to this system in which case the original should be the accurate<br />

information, or it can be due to separate readings being taken and the results being stored in these<br />

different systems. All records hold administrative/demographic data for each patient and Table 1 only<br />

lists non-administrative information.<br />

Table 1: HISs used in treating patients with breast cancer in Wales, UK<br />

HIS Health Record Type Information Stored<br />

1. GP-System GP-records Clinical presentation report<br />

Clinical assessment report<br />

Clinical history report-[2]<br />

Physical examination report-[2]<br />

Filled referral form (include patient details, referring doctor<br />

details, medical context, and referral information)-[2]<br />

Information about referred patients’ diagnosis (by the end of<br />

Triple Assessment path way)-[2]<br />

MDT recommendations and treatment plans-[2,6,7]<br />

Given treatment plan-[2]<br />

Given medication-[2]<br />

Follow-up plan-[2]<br />

2. Secondary-<br />

Care-System<br />

Follow-up visits report-[2]<br />

Secondary-care-records Referral form-[1]<br />

Clinical history report-[1]<br />

Clinical examination code-[1]<br />

Tests requests (e.g. blood, ultrasound, X-ray test)-[3,4]<br />

Blood test results report-[3]<br />

X-ray and Ultrasound results report-[4]<br />

Pathologists reports-[5]<br />

Radiologists and oncologists results reports-[6]<br />

Surgeons reports-[7]<br />

General patient case notes including: (BC diagnostic, staging,<br />

pathology information, histology reports, and tests’ result<br />

reports)-[1,3,4,5,6,7]<br />

General information addressing the patient’s specific situation<br />

(in leaflets, audio or video CDs format)<br />

MDT recommendations and treatment plans-[1,6,7]<br />

Given treatment plan<br />

Follow-up plan<br />

Follow-up visits report<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!