06.08.2013 Views

Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...

Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...

Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

per<strong>for</strong>mance of their next generation single tires against the standard dual tires used by most of the<br />

industry. Because of the energy efficiency aspect of their research interest, Michelin’s collaboration<br />

on this project was endorsed by DOE. For the pilot test, Michelin provided a full set of new<br />

generation single tires <strong>for</strong> the tractor-trailer, provided a full set of the standard dual tires, and<br />

provided the use of a V-Box data collection system at no charge to the project. Data on fuel<br />

consumption and associated parameters would be shared with Michelin. A verbal agreement to<br />

participate as a partner in the HVDC project was provided by Ibrahim Janajreh of Michelin in<br />

January 2005.<br />

3.3.1.2 USDOT/FMCSA/NHTSA and Virginia Tech Interactions: As the project kicked off in<br />

January 2005, ORNL re-contacted FMCSA to assess interest in participating in the HVDC project.<br />

Although interested, FMCSA, as well as other USDOT agencies were still in a continuing budget<br />

resolution, and had been since October 2003. No firm commitment was received from FMCSA. A<br />

request was made by FMCSA to keep them in<strong>for</strong>med about the HVDC ef<strong>for</strong>ts, and to start a<br />

dialogue with Virginia Tech who had conducted some naturalistic driving ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> FMCSA in the<br />

past. Also requested was that ORNL re-communicate with FMCSA after the pilot test ended and<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the field test was to be initiated.<br />

Rich Hanowski of Virginia Tech was contacted in 2004 regarding the HVDC pilot test; but because<br />

of their lack of funding, no firm commitments were made.<br />

As suggested by FMCSA, ORNL kept FMCSA aware of progress during the pilot test, and initiated<br />

discussions with representatives of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)<br />

(Duane Perrin, Jim Britell and Tim Johnson). In late fall-2005, as the HVDC pilot testing was<br />

underway, ORNL arranged a meeting with both FMCSA (Jeff Loftus and Luke Loy) and NHTSA<br />

(Tim Johnson and Jim Britell) to discuss HVDC progress and explore interest in the field testing<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>t. The meetings were held in early December 2005. Again, interest was expressed, but no<br />

commitments were made. Additional interactions were pursued in winter, 2005; again, with no<br />

commitments made. The window <strong>for</strong> USDOT participation is closing due to the need to finalize<br />

field test instrumentation in March, 2006.<br />

In February, 2006, ORNL contacted Ms. Debbie Freund (FMCSA) and Mr. Bob Carroll (FMCSA)<br />

who have been working in the areas of tire inflation systems and driver fatigue/naturalistic driving,<br />

respectively. No feedback about joint ef<strong>for</strong>ts has been received.<br />

3.3.1.3 Kick-Off Meeting: A <strong>Project</strong> kick-off meeting was held at Michelin’s Research <strong>Center</strong> in<br />

Greenville SC on February 7, 2005. Representatives from Michelin, Dana and ORNL were present.<br />

Representatives from ANL and Virginia Tech participated via a conference-call. The meeting went<br />

very well with all representatives extremely excited about this work. An initial list of sensors and<br />

duty cycle parameters was produced.<br />

3.3.1.4 Memorandums of Agreement: ORNL drafted memorandums of agreement (MOAs) between<br />

ORNL and Dana, and ORNL and Michelin, respectively in February, 2005. Copies were <strong>for</strong>warded<br />

to Dana and Michelin, and a small number of suggested changes were made and finalized in March,<br />

2005. The MOAs were sent to ORNL contracts in April, 2005 and although these documents were<br />

not considered to be legally binding, ORNL’s contracts office was unable to help project staff<br />

A-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!