Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...
Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...
Class-8 Heavy Truck Duty Cycle Project Final Report - Center for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
per<strong>for</strong>mance of their next generation single tires against the standard dual tires used by most of the<br />
industry. Because of the energy efficiency aspect of their research interest, Michelin’s collaboration<br />
on this project was endorsed by DOE. For the pilot test, Michelin provided a full set of new<br />
generation single tires <strong>for</strong> the tractor-trailer, provided a full set of the standard dual tires, and<br />
provided the use of a V-Box data collection system at no charge to the project. Data on fuel<br />
consumption and associated parameters would be shared with Michelin. A verbal agreement to<br />
participate as a partner in the HVDC project was provided by Ibrahim Janajreh of Michelin in<br />
January 2005.<br />
3.3.1.2 USDOT/FMCSA/NHTSA and Virginia Tech Interactions: As the project kicked off in<br />
January 2005, ORNL re-contacted FMCSA to assess interest in participating in the HVDC project.<br />
Although interested, FMCSA, as well as other USDOT agencies were still in a continuing budget<br />
resolution, and had been since October 2003. No firm commitment was received from FMCSA. A<br />
request was made by FMCSA to keep them in<strong>for</strong>med about the HVDC ef<strong>for</strong>ts, and to start a<br />
dialogue with Virginia Tech who had conducted some naturalistic driving ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> FMCSA in the<br />
past. Also requested was that ORNL re-communicate with FMCSA after the pilot test ended and<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e the field test was to be initiated.<br />
Rich Hanowski of Virginia Tech was contacted in 2004 regarding the HVDC pilot test; but because<br />
of their lack of funding, no firm commitments were made.<br />
As suggested by FMCSA, ORNL kept FMCSA aware of progress during the pilot test, and initiated<br />
discussions with representatives of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)<br />
(Duane Perrin, Jim Britell and Tim Johnson). In late fall-2005, as the HVDC pilot testing was<br />
underway, ORNL arranged a meeting with both FMCSA (Jeff Loftus and Luke Loy) and NHTSA<br />
(Tim Johnson and Jim Britell) to discuss HVDC progress and explore interest in the field testing<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>t. The meetings were held in early December 2005. Again, interest was expressed, but no<br />
commitments were made. Additional interactions were pursued in winter, 2005; again, with no<br />
commitments made. The window <strong>for</strong> USDOT participation is closing due to the need to finalize<br />
field test instrumentation in March, 2006.<br />
In February, 2006, ORNL contacted Ms. Debbie Freund (FMCSA) and Mr. Bob Carroll (FMCSA)<br />
who have been working in the areas of tire inflation systems and driver fatigue/naturalistic driving,<br />
respectively. No feedback about joint ef<strong>for</strong>ts has been received.<br />
3.3.1.3 Kick-Off Meeting: A <strong>Project</strong> kick-off meeting was held at Michelin’s Research <strong>Center</strong> in<br />
Greenville SC on February 7, 2005. Representatives from Michelin, Dana and ORNL were present.<br />
Representatives from ANL and Virginia Tech participated via a conference-call. The meeting went<br />
very well with all representatives extremely excited about this work. An initial list of sensors and<br />
duty cycle parameters was produced.<br />
3.3.1.4 Memorandums of Agreement: ORNL drafted memorandums of agreement (MOAs) between<br />
ORNL and Dana, and ORNL and Michelin, respectively in February, 2005. Copies were <strong>for</strong>warded<br />
to Dana and Michelin, and a small number of suggested changes were made and finalized in March,<br />
2005. The MOAs were sent to ORNL contracts in April, 2005 and although these documents were<br />
not considered to be legally binding, ORNL’s contracts office was unable to help project staff<br />
A-10