12.08.2013 Views

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11 IMSC Session Program<br />

Probabilistic surface air temperature predictions: comparing<br />

global climate models with nonlinear time series models<br />

Thursday - Parallel Session 6<br />

Siddharth Arora 1,3 , Max A. Little 2 and Patrick E. McSharry 1,3<br />

1 Department of Mathematics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK<br />

2 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK<br />

3 Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Oxford, UK<br />

Climate variability can be attributed to either internal dynamics or external forcing.<br />

Internal dynamics are the unforced natural changes in our environment, such as the El<br />

Nino cycles or anomalies of ocean heat content, which usually account for short-term<br />

regional changes in the climate [1]. External forcing caused by human activity, such<br />

as increasing CO2 emissions, account for recent global climatic changes [2]. Long<br />

term projections for global climatic change are undertaken using Global Climate<br />

Models (GCMs). Government policy and decision-making in the private sector over<br />

the coming decades relies heavily on accurate long term projections of surface air<br />

temperatures. As these policies will in turn have a large effect on global climate<br />

change, the need for rigorous evaluation of projections from GCMs is of utmost<br />

importance. The focus of our study is to assess surface air temperature predictions<br />

obtained from the Decadal Climate Prediction System (DePreSys), a dynamical GCM<br />

based on the Hadley Center Coupled Model. We investigate the potential of<br />

parsimonious nonlinear time series models, with only a few parameters, to compete<br />

with the GCM both in terms of point and density forecasts over varying horizons.<br />

Comparisons between GCM projections, appropriate benchmarks, and proposed<br />

nonlinear models is undertaken using different performance scores, including root<br />

mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the continuous ranked<br />

probability score (CRPS).<br />

[1] P. A. Stott, S. F. B. Tett, G. S. Jones, M. R. Allen, J. F. B. Mitchell, G. J. Jenkins,<br />

“External Control of 20 th Century Temperature by Natural and Anthropogenic<br />

Forcings”, Science, 2000, 290, 2133 – 2137.<br />

[2] D. M. Smith, S. Cusack, A. W. Colman, C. K. Folland, G. R. Harris and J. M.<br />

Murphy, “Improved Surface Temperature Prediction for the Coming Decade from a<br />

Global Climate Model”, Science, 2007, 317, 796-799.<br />

Abstracts 263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!