12.08.2013 Views

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

final_program_abstracts[1]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11 IMSC Session Program<br />

New indices for monitoring changes in heatwaves and<br />

extended cold spells<br />

Friday - Parallel Session 7<br />

Blair Trewin<br />

National Climate Centre, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia<br />

Changes in temperature extremes have attracted considerable attention in recent years,<br />

and numerous analyses have been published of changes in the occurrence of singleday<br />

extremes. While the impact of multi-day extreme events, such as the European<br />

heatwave of 2003, is well-known, there have been limited analyses of changes in such<br />

events. A major contributor to this gap in analyses has been the lack of suitable,<br />

widely-applicable indices which can be used to define multi-day heatwaves (or cold<br />

spells), with most indices proposed either specific to a particular location, subject to<br />

qualities which make them difficult to analyse (e.g. many years with zero or null<br />

values), or both. The percentile-based approach widely used for indices of single-day<br />

extremes breaks down for multi-day events as the probability of the number of<br />

consecutive days above (below) a threshold is a product of the autocorrelation<br />

structure of the daily time series as well as the frequency distribution of daily values.<br />

A new suite of indices is proposed to address this question. These indices are defined<br />

in each year, for a period of N days, as:<br />

(a) the highest (lowest) temperature T such that there are at least N consecutive days<br />

above (below) T in the year concerned;<br />

(b) the mean temperature of the N-day period defined by (a) above; and<br />

(c) the highest (lowest) value of the N-day running mean of temperature during the<br />

year.<br />

These indices are defined in every year which satisfy data completeness criteria, and<br />

as they are defined in terms of °C, changes in their values can be readily compared<br />

with changes in mean temperatures at the same location. They can be applied to daily<br />

maximum, minimum or mean temperatures. An analysis of data from a range of<br />

regions, including Australia, Europe, Canada and Antarctica, found that, in addition to<br />

the absence of null values, the frequency distribution of these indices did not<br />

significantly differ from the normal (Gaussian) at a substantial proportion of stations,<br />

with only 7-15% of stations (depending on the index) showing skewness significant at<br />

the 95% level, compared with 25-100% for other indices previously used in the<br />

literature. The new indices also appear to be effective in identifying the most extreme<br />

events such as the August 2003 heatwave in France. One drawback of the new indices<br />

is that their definition is relatively complex and difficult to communicate to a lay<br />

audience.<br />

An analysis of trends over the period 1961-2007 for 5-day periods for index (a) found<br />

strong positive trends in most cases. For Australian stations, trends ranged from<br />

+0.05°C/decade for high maxima to +0.25°C/decade for low minima, while for<br />

European stations trends ranged from +0.33°C/decade for high maxima to<br />

+0.60°C/decade for low minima.<br />

These indices may also be used to investigate the relationship between extended<br />

heatwaves (or cold spells) and broad-scale drivers of climate variability. An<br />

Abstracts 342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!