15.08.2013 Views

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kingston-upon-Thames court house<br />

5.62 As in Croydon, so too in Kingston-upon-Thames. The old court house, by 1808,<br />

had fallen into disrepair and was inadequate to house the county quarter<br />

sessions or the assizes. The solution was to rebuild the court house and the<br />

market house, utilising moneys derived from sale <strong>of</strong> various common and waste<br />

lands. The Kingston-upon-Thames and Imworth Inclosure, Court House and<br />

Market House Act 1808 38 authorised, amongst other things, the bailiffs and<br />

freemen <strong>of</strong> Kingston-upon-Thames to sell <strong>of</strong>f certain allotment lands and to use<br />

the moneys realised to enlarge or replace the town hall and court house, and to<br />

build a new market house with ancillary accommodation. If land became surplus<br />

to requirements it could also be sold and the funds applied in similar manner<br />

(with any residue held for parochial purposes). Likewise, if further parcels <strong>of</strong> land<br />

were needed for the scheme they could be acquired.<br />

5.63 The new guildhall building in Kingston was not completed and opened until 1840,<br />

mainly through land sale difficulties. It housed the court room and council<br />

chamber on the upper floor, with market accommodation below, and operated as<br />

a municipal building until 1935. Today the building still exists (as the market<br />

house) and houses the tourist information centre. The provisions in the 1808 Act<br />

relating to the town hall and courts are now spent and may be repealed. 39<br />

GROUP 17 - WORCESTERSHIRE<br />

Kingsnorton court <strong>of</strong> requests<br />

5.64 In 1840, in the parishes <strong>of</strong> Kingsnorton and Northfield in Worcestershire, creditors<br />

were finding it uneconomic to institute proceedings for the recovery <strong>of</strong> small debts<br />

because the cost <strong>of</strong> litigation outweighed the value <strong>of</strong> the return. The aim <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Kingsnorton and Northfield Small Debts Recovery Act 1840 40 was to rectify this<br />

issue by putting in place a less expensive recovery method. The Act established<br />

a court <strong>of</strong> requests to sit in the two parishes on a regular basis, presided over by<br />

a judge appointed by the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Keeper or the Lords<br />

<strong>Commission</strong>ers. The court was to be supported by a clerk and a treasurer, and its<br />

jurisdiction was to be limited to claims <strong>of</strong> up to £15 in value (with jury trial for<br />

claims exceeding £5). The Act also set up mechanisms for enforcement <strong>of</strong> its<br />

orders.<br />

5.65 Concurrent jurisdiction was not removed (so that claimants could choose their<br />

forum), the judge had the ability to order retrial in the event <strong>of</strong> error by a jury, and<br />

the Westminster superior courts retained power in certain limited circumstances<br />

to order review <strong>of</strong> the court’s proceedings.<br />

38 48 Geo.3 c.cxxxiv (1808).<br />

39 These provisions in the 1808 Act are sections 47 to 54 inclusive. The remaining portions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Act which deal with the enclosure and sale <strong>of</strong> common and waste lands in Kingstonupon-Thames<br />

and Imbercourt in Surrey are not proposed for repeal because they fall<br />

outside the scope <strong>of</strong> the present topic.<br />

40 3 & 4 Vict. c.lxix (1840).<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!