15.08.2013 Views

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART 7<br />

LOTTERIES<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

7.1 Discussed in this Part are two types <strong>of</strong> lottery statute: the old (from 1711 to<br />

1807), which authorised the holding <strong>of</strong> private lotteries, <strong>of</strong>ten to facilitate the<br />

realisation <strong>of</strong> art collections or items <strong>of</strong> value; and the more modern, in the form<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1971 legislation, designed to control pool competitions as a form <strong>of</strong> betting.<br />

<strong>Statute</strong>s in each category have since lost their usefulness. The individuals and<br />

organisations consulted about these proposals are set out in Appendix 3.<br />

PRIVATE LOTTERIES<br />

7.2 Private lotteries were prohibited by statute in 1698. 1 They were only permitted<br />

where authorised by specific Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament. Between 1711 and 1807 six Acts<br />

were passed which enabled a variety <strong>of</strong> private lotteries to be held in London with<br />

a view to raising funds for the relevant lottery promoters. In each instance the<br />

main purpose behind the lottery was to sell sufficient tickets at a price which,<br />

cumulatively, would cover the value <strong>of</strong> the principal prize or prizes - in other<br />

words, the asset - on <strong>of</strong>fer. The lottery mechanism was an alternative to trying to<br />

effect outright sale <strong>of</strong> the asset which, given the prevailing economic<br />

circumstances, would prove (or had proved) impractical. Sale by this method was<br />

authorised either because some wider public benefit was likely to flow or because<br />

the asset owner had already contributed to the national interest by promoting the<br />

fine arts and their artists.<br />

The Million Lottery<br />

7.3 In 1693 an Act was passed 2 which (amongst other things) authorised the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the so-called Million Lottery scheme, involving the sale <strong>of</strong> up to<br />

100,000 tickets to “natives or foreigners”. This state-sponsored scheme was<br />

designed to raise the sum <strong>of</strong> £1 million “towards carrying on the war against<br />

France”. 3 Under it some 2,500 tickets each year would become eligible for prizes<br />

<strong>of</strong> between £10 and £1,000. The lottery draws appear to have spanned some 130<br />

years, and provided a form <strong>of</strong> long-term loan to government. Lottery tickets <strong>of</strong> this<br />

nature were a secure investment, providing a chance to win a prize sum, with<br />

guaranteed recovery <strong>of</strong> the invested capital (much on the lines <strong>of</strong> today’s NS&I<br />

premium bonds).<br />

1 10 Will. 3 c.23 (1698) (Act for suppression <strong>of</strong> lotteries), repealed in 1934 in England and<br />

Wales, and in 1957 for Northern Ireland. The 1698 Act was followed by other statutes<br />

designed to prohibit private lotteries and to regulate state-promoted lotteries: 9 Ann. c.6<br />

(1710), 8 Geo.1 c.2 (1721) and 13 Geo.2 c.19 (1739), all now repealed.<br />

2 5 Will. & Mar. c.7 (1693), which was principally a taxation statute. Sections 34 to 49 dealt<br />

with the lottery arrangements. The Act was fully repealed by 1957.<br />

3 State lotteries were designed to raise revenue for government, to underwrite state loans, to<br />

fund public projects and to reduce the national debt. See generally on state lotteries in the<br />

18 th century, D. Miers Regulating Commercial Gambling: Past, Present, and Future (OUP,<br />

2004), chap 5.2.<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!