15.08.2013 Views

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

Statute Law Repeals - Law Commission - Ministry of Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1893: Provisional Order Confirmation Act<br />

9.215 The Railway Rates and Charges (Cranbrook and Paddock Wood Railway, &c.)<br />

Order Confirmation Act 1893 452 listed four railway companies which were deemed<br />

to have their maximum rates and charges fixed by previous specific confirmation<br />

Acts. The Cranbrook and Paddock Wood Railway 453 was thus deemed to have<br />

been included within the South-Eastern Railway Company (Rates and Charges)<br />

Order Confirmation Act 1891 454 for the purpose <strong>of</strong> merchandise charging.<br />

1894: Provisional Order Confirmation Acts<br />

9.216 The Railway Rates and Charges (Easingwold Railway, &c.) Order Confirmation<br />

Act 1894 455 adopted a format similar to that employed in the 1893 Act. The 1894<br />

Act applied various previous confirmation Acts to some seven railway company<br />

operations, <strong>of</strong> which none had any apparent connection with any other. The<br />

companies ranged from Harrow and Stanmore in England to Crieff and Comrie in<br />

Scotland and to South Clare in Ireland. The Easingwold Railway in the title<br />

opened in 1891 and was worked eventually by the North Eastern Railway,<br />

although it remained an independent operation (avoiding nationalisation) until<br />

closure in 1957.<br />

9.217 The Mersey Railway (Rates and Charges) Act 1894 456 effected a change to the<br />

railway company’s charging arrangements by removing it from one statutory<br />

regime and transplanting it within another. The Mersey Railway, which ran in a<br />

tunnel beneath the river and a substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> urban area, opened in<br />

1886 and converted from steam to electric traction in 1903. In 1894 it needed to<br />

increase its merchandise traffic (and its revenues). The Mersey Railway had<br />

originally been governed by the 1892 (No. 18) Act (see above) relating to the Taff<br />

Vale Railway. By 1894 it was clear that the challenges (and costs) associated<br />

with a river tunnel railway - such as water pumping and ventilation - were more<br />

akin to those <strong>of</strong> the East London Railway. Accordingly the No. 18 Act was<br />

disapplied (by omission) and the charging regime in the 1892 (No. 5) Act relating<br />

to the East London Railway was applied (by insertion). No provisional order as<br />

such was attached to the 1894 Act. The Mersey Railway was eventually<br />

nationalised in 1948.<br />

452 56 & 57 Vict. c.cxii (1893).<br />

453 The railway was only fully operational by 1893, and it was run from the outset by the<br />

South-Eastern Railway (which absorbed the company in 1900).<br />

454 54 & 55 Vict. c.ccxx (1891): see above. The other three companies (which had no<br />

geographic nexus) were the Glyn Valley Tramway Company (which referred back to the<br />

1892 (No. 6) Act, above), the Manchester Ship Canal Company (which was linked to the<br />

1891 LNWR Act, above), and the Stratford-upon-Avon, Towcester, and Midland Junction<br />

Railway Company (which was deemed named in the 1892 (No.11) Act, above).<br />

455 57 & 58 Vict. c.xlviii (1894).<br />

456 57 & 58 Vict. c.lxxii (1894).<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!