03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

more with Calvinism, though she has never believed that in order to escape from<br />

Pelagianism, it is necessary to run into the doctrine of absolute predestination. The<br />

‘Formula of Concord’ touches the five points almost purely on their practical sides, and<br />

on them arrays itself against Calvinism, rather <strong>by</strong> the negation of the inferences which<br />

result logically from that system, than <strong>by</strong> express condemnation of its fundamental<br />

theory in its abstract form.” 43 In so far as Lutheran theologians include the doctrine of<br />

predestination in their system, they generally consider it in connection with Soteriology.<br />

Naturally, Arminian theology does not place the doctrine of the decrees in the<br />

foreground. That of the decrees in general is usually conspicuous <strong>by</strong> its absence. Pope<br />

brings in the doctrine of predestination only in passing, and Miley introduces it as an<br />

issue for discussion. Raymond discusses only the doctrine of election, and Watson<br />

devotes considerable space to this in considering the extent of the atonement. One and<br />

all reject the doctrine of absolute predestination, and substitute for it a conditional<br />

predestination. Modern liberal theology does not concern itself with the doctrine of<br />

predestination, since it is fundamentally anthropological. In the “theology of crisis” it is<br />

again recognized, but in a form that is neither Scriptural nor historical. In spite of its<br />

appeal to the Reformers, it departs widely from the doctrine of predestination, as it was<br />

taught <strong>by</strong> Luther and Calvin.<br />

B. SCRIPTURAL NAMES FOR THE DIVINE DECREES<br />

From the purely immanent works of God (opera ad intra) we must distinguish those<br />

which bear directly on the creatures (opera ad extra). Some theologians, in order to avoid<br />

misunderstanding, prefer to speak of opera immanentia and opera exeuntia, and subdivide<br />

the former into two classes, opera immanentia per se, which are the opera personalia<br />

(generation, filiation, spiration), and opera immanentia donec exeunt, which are opera<br />

essentialia, that is, works of the triune God, in distinction from works of any one of the<br />

persons of the Godhead, but are immanent in God, until they are realized in the works<br />

of creation, providence, and redemption. The divine decrees constitute this class of<br />

divine works. They are not described in the abstract in Scripture, but are placed before<br />

us in their historical realization. Scripture uses several terms for the eternal decree of<br />

God.<br />

1. OLD TESTAMENT TERMS. There are some terms which stress the intellectual element<br />

in the decree, such as ’etsah from ya’ats, to counsel, to give advice, Job 38:2; Isa. 14:26;<br />

46:11; sod from yasad, to sit together in deliberation (niphal), Jer. 23:18,22; and mezimmah<br />

43 The Conservative Reformation and Its <strong>Theology</strong>, pp. 127f.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!