03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nevertheless to have agreed with Calvin in regarding true repentance as one of the fruits<br />

of faith. Lutherans are wont to stress the fact that repentance is wrought <strong>by</strong> the law and<br />

faith <strong>by</strong> the gospel. It should be borne in mind, however, that the two cannot be<br />

separated; they are simply complementary parts of the same process.<br />

E. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONVERSION.<br />

During recent years psychologists have made a special study of the phenomena of<br />

conversion.<br />

1. THE NATURE OF THIS STUDY. The nature of this study can best be learned from such<br />

works as those of Coe, The Spiritual Life; Starbuck, The Psychology of Religion; James,<br />

Varieties of Religious Experience; Ames, The Psychology of Religious Experience; Pratt, The<br />

Religious Consciousness; Clark, The Psychology of Religious Awakening; Hughes, The <strong>New</strong><br />

Psychology and Religious Experience; and Horton, The Psychological Approach to <strong>Theology</strong>.<br />

For a long time Psychology neglected the facts of the religious life altogether, but for<br />

more than a quarter of a century now it has taken notice of them. At first the attention<br />

was focussed primarily — not to say exclusively — on what must have appeared to be<br />

the great central fact of religious experience, the fact of conversion. Psychologists have<br />

studied many cases of conversion inductively and have attempted to classify the<br />

various forces at work in conversion, to distinguish the different types of religious<br />

experience, to determine the period of life in which conversion is most apt to occur, and<br />

to discover the laws that control the phenomena of conversion. While they presented<br />

their study as a purely inductive investigation into the phenomena of religion as shown<br />

in individual experience, and in some cases expressed the laudable desire and intention<br />

to keep their own philosophical and religious convictions in the background, they<br />

nevertheless in several instances clearly revealed a tendency to look upon conversion as<br />

a purely natural process, just as amenable to the ordinary laws of psychology as any<br />

other psychical fact; and to overlook, if not to deny explicitly, its supernatural aspect.<br />

The more careful scholars among them ignore, but do not deny, the supernatural in<br />

conversion. They explain their silence respecting the deeper aspects of this central fact<br />

in religious experience <strong>by</strong> calling attention to their limitations as psychologists. They<br />

can only deal with observed facts and the psychical laws which evidently control them,<br />

but have no right to probe into the possible or probable spiritual background, in which<br />

these facts find their explanation. They have pointed out that conversion is not a<br />

specifically Christian phenomenon, but is also found in other religions; and that it is not<br />

necessarily a religious phenomenon, but also occurs in non-religious spheres. In fact, it<br />

is but one of the many changes that occur in the period of adolescence, “a sudden<br />

540

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!