03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

appropriating organ in a twofold sense: (a) It is the organ <strong>by</strong> which we lay hold on and<br />

appropriate the merits of Christ, and accept these as the meritorious ground of our<br />

justification. As such it logically precedes justification. (b) It is also the organ <strong>by</strong> which<br />

we consciously apprehend our justification and obtain possession of subjective<br />

justification. In this sense it logically follows justification. On the whole this name<br />

deserves preference, though it should be borne in mind that, strictly speaking, faith is<br />

the organ <strong>by</strong> which we appropriate the righteousness of Christ as the ground of our<br />

justification, rather than the organ <strong>by</strong> which we appropriate justification itself.<br />

(3) Conditio sine qua non. This name, suggested <strong>by</strong> some Reformed theologians, did<br />

not meet with great favor. It expresses the idea, which is perfectly true in itself, that man<br />

is not justified apart from faith, and that faith is an indispensable condition of<br />

justification. The name expresses nothing positive, and is, moreover, liable to<br />

misunderstanding.<br />

G. THE GROUND OF JUSTIFICATION.<br />

One of the most important points of controversy between the Church of Rome and<br />

the Reformers, and between Reformed theology and the Arminians, concerned the<br />

ground of justification. With respect to this the Reformers taught:<br />

1. Negatively, that this cannot be found in any virtue of man, nor in his good works.<br />

This position must also be maintained at present over against Rome and the<br />

Pelagianizing tendencies of various Churches. Rome teaches that the sinner is justified<br />

on the basis of the inherent righteousness that has been infused into his heart, and<br />

which, in turn, is the fruit of the co-operation of the human will with prevenient grace.<br />

This applies to what is called the first justification; in all following justification the good<br />

works of man come into consideration as the formal cause or ground of justification. It<br />

is impossible, however, that the inherent righteousness of the regenerate man and his<br />

good works should constitute the ground of his justification, for (a) this righteousness is<br />

and remains during this life a very imperfect righteousness; (b) it is itself already the<br />

fruit of the righteousness of Christ and of the grace of God; and (c) even the best works<br />

of believers are polluted <strong>by</strong> sin. Moreover, Scripture teaches us very clearly that man is<br />

justified freely <strong>by</strong> the grace of God, Rom. 3:24, and that he cannot possibly be justified<br />

<strong>by</strong> the works of the law, Rom. 3:28; Gal. 2:16; 3:11.<br />

2. Positively, that the ground of justification can be found only in the perfect<br />

righteousness of Jesus Christ, which is imputed to the sinner in justification. This is<br />

plainly taught in several passages of Scripture, such as Rom. 3:24; 5:9,19; 8:1; 10:4; I Cor.<br />

581

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!