03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

II. The State of Exaltation<br />

A. GENERAL REMARKS ON THE STATE OF EXALTATION.<br />

1. THE SUBJECT AND NATURE OF THE EXALTATION. As already indicated in the<br />

preceding, there is a difference of opinion between Lutheran and Reformed theology on<br />

the subject of the states of Christ. The former deny that the Logos, and assert that the<br />

human nature of Christ, is the subject of the states of humiliation and exaltation. Hence<br />

they exclude the incarnation from the humiliation of Christ, and maintain that the state<br />

of humiliation consists in this, “that Christ for a time renounced (truly and really, yet<br />

freely) the plenary exercise of the divine majesty, which His human nature had acquired<br />

in the personal union, and, as a lowly man, endured what was far beneath the divine<br />

majesty (that He might suffer and die for the love of the world).” 23 They hold that the<br />

state of exaltation became manifest first of all to the lower world in the descent into<br />

hades, and further to this world in the resurrection and ascension, reaching its<br />

completion in the session at the right hand of God. The exaltation, then, consists in this<br />

that the human nature assumed the plenary exercise of the divine attributes that were<br />

communicated to it at the incarnation, but were used only occasionally or secretly.<br />

Reformed theology, on the other hand, regards the person of the Mediator, that is, the<br />

God-man, as the subject of the exaltation, but stresses the fact that it was, of course, the<br />

human nature in which the exaltation took place. The divine nature is not capable of<br />

humiliation or exaltation. In the exaltation the God-man, Jesus Christ, (a) passed from<br />

under the law in its federal and penal aspects, and consequently from under the burden<br />

of the law as the condition of the covenant of works, and from under the curse of the<br />

law; (b) exchanged the penal for the righteous relation to the law, and as Mediator<br />

entered into possession of the blessings of salvation which He merited for sinners; and<br />

(c) was crowned with a corresponding honor and glory. It had to appear also in His<br />

condition that the curse of sin was lifted. His exaltation was also His glorification.<br />

2. THE EXALTATION OF CHRIST BOTH SCRIPTURAL AND REASONABLE. There is abundant<br />

Scriptural proof for the exaltation of Christ. The gospel story clearly shows us that the<br />

humiliation of Christ was followed <strong>by</strong> His exaltation. The classical passage to prove the<br />

latter is found in Phil. 2:9-11: “Wherefore also God highly exalted Him, and gave unto<br />

Him the name which is above every name; that in the name of Jesus every knee should<br />

bow, of things in heaven and things on earth, and that every tongue should confess that<br />

23 Baier, quoted <strong>by</strong> Schmid, Doctrinal <strong>Theology</strong> of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, p. 383.<br />

378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!