03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV. Creation of the Spiritual World<br />

A. THE DOCTRINE OF THE ANGELS IN HISTORY<br />

There are clear evidences of belief in the existence of angels from the very beginning<br />

of the Christian era. Some of them were regarded as good, and others as evil. The<br />

former were held in high esteem as personal beings of a lofty order, endowed with<br />

moral freedom, engaged in the joyful service of God, and employed <strong>by</strong> God to minister<br />

to the welfare of men. According to some of the early Church Fathers they had fine<br />

ethereal bodies. The general conviction was that all angels were created good, but that<br />

some abused their freedom and fell away from God. Satan, who was originally an angel<br />

of eminent rank, was regarded as their head. The cause of his fall was found in pride<br />

and sinful ambition, while the fall of his subordinates was ascribed to their lusting after<br />

the daughters of men. This view was based on what was then the common<br />

interpretation of Gen. 6:2. Alongside of the general idea that the good angels ministered<br />

to the needs and welfare of believers, the specific notion of guardian angels for<br />

individual churches and individual men was cherished <strong>by</strong> some. Calamities of various<br />

kinds, such as sicknesses, accidents, and losses, were frequently ascribed to the baneful<br />

influence of evil spirits. The idea of a hierarchy of angels already made its appearance<br />

(Clement of Alexandria), but it was not considered proper to worship any of the angels.<br />

As time went on the angels continued to be regarded as blessed spirits, superior to<br />

men in knowledge, and free from the encumbrance of gross material bodies. While<br />

some still ascribed to them fine ethereal bodies, there was an ever increasing uncertainty<br />

as to whether they had any bodies at all. They who still clung to the idea that they were<br />

corporeal did this, so it seems, in the interest of the truth that they were subject to<br />

spatial limitations. Dionysius the Areopagite divided the angels into three classes: the<br />

first class consisting of Thrones, Cherubim, and Seraphim; the second, of Mights,<br />

Dominions, and Powers; and the third, of Principalities, Archangels, and Angels. The<br />

first class is represented as enjoying the closest communion with God; the second, as<br />

being enlightened <strong>by</strong> the first; and the third, as being enlightened <strong>by</strong> the second. This<br />

classification was adopted <strong>by</strong> several later writers. Augustine stressed the fact that the<br />

good angels were rewarded for their obedience <strong>by</strong> the gift of perseverance, which<br />

carried with it the assurance that they would never fall. Pride was still regarded as the<br />

cause of Satan’s fall, but the idea that the rest of the angels fell as the result of their<br />

lusting after the daughters of men, though still held <strong>by</strong> some, was gradually<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!