03.09.2013 Views

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

Systematic Theology, by Louis Berkhof - New Leaven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. SCRIPTURAL DATA FOR THE COVENANT OF REDEMPTION.<br />

The name “counsel of peace” is derived from Zech. 6:13. Coccejus and others found<br />

in this passage a reference to an agreement between the Father and the Son. This was<br />

clearly a mistake, for the words refer to the union of the kingly and priestly offices in<br />

the Messiah. The Scriptural character of the name cannot be maintained, but this, of<br />

course, does not detract from the reality of the counsel of peace. The doctrine of this<br />

eternal counsel rests on the following Scriptural basis.<br />

1. Scripture clearly points to the fact that the plan of redemption was included in the<br />

eternal decree or counsel of God, Eph. 1:4 ff.; 3:11; II Thess. 2:13; II Tim. 1:9; Jas. 2:5; I<br />

Pet. 1:2, etc. Now we find that in the economy of redemption there is, in a sense, a<br />

division of labor: the Father is the originator, the Son the executor, and the Holy Spirit<br />

the applier. This can only be the result of a voluntary agreement among the persons of<br />

the Trinity, so that their internal relations assume the form of a covenant life. In fact, it is<br />

exactly in the trinitarian life that we find the archetype of the historical covenants, a<br />

covenant in the proper and fullest sense of the word, the parties meeting on a footing of<br />

equality, a true suntheke.<br />

2. There are passages of Scripture which not only point to the fact that the plan of<br />

God for the salvation of sinners was eternal, Eph. 1:4; 3:9,11, but also indicate that it was<br />

of the nature of a covenant. Christ speaks of promises made to Him before his advent,<br />

and repeatedly refers to a commission which He had received from the Father, John<br />

5:30,43; 6:38-40; 17:4-12. And in Rom. 5:12-21 and I Cor. 15:22 He is clearly regarded as a<br />

representative head, that is, as the head of a covenant.<br />

3. Wherever we have the essential elements of a covenant, namely, contracting<br />

parties, a promise or promises, and a condition, there we have a covenant. In Ps. 2:7-9<br />

the parties are mentioned and a promise is indicated. The Messianic character of this<br />

passage is guaranteed <strong>by</strong> Acts 13:33; Heb. 1:5; 5:5. Again, in Ps. 40:7-9, also attested as<br />

Messianic <strong>by</strong> the <strong>New</strong> Testament (Heb. 10:5-7), the Messiah expresses His readiness to<br />

do the Father’s will in becoming a sacrifice for sin. Christ repeatedly speaks of a task<br />

which the Father has entrusted to Him, John 6:38,39; 10:18; 17:4. The statement in Luke<br />

22:29 is particularly significant: “I appoint unto you a kingdom, even as my Father<br />

appointed unto me.” The verb used here is diatithemi, the word from which diatheke is<br />

derived, which means to appoint <strong>by</strong> will, testament or covenant. Moreover, in John 17:5<br />

Christ claims a reward, and in John 17:6,9,24 (cf. also Phil. 2:9-11) He refers to His<br />

people and His future glory as a reward given Him <strong>by</strong> the Father.<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!